http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-gop-tax-reform-bill-analysis-reviews-text-2017-11 Three new analyses of the Senate's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act all delivered bad news for Republican leaders. The Tax Policy Center found that more than 50% of Americans would see a tax increase in 2027 under the bill. Only one out of 42 economists surveyed by the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business said the bill would increase economic growth substantially. The Penn-Wharton Budget Model found that the bill would blow a hole in the federal deficit.
Well he can't call Penn-Wharton a third rate school now.. or can he..? Considering the gravity of the situation, far greater than any threat of terrorism I say waterboard Steve Mnuchin.
And what did “they” say about Obamacare? Here’s a hint- “They” said it would lower costs for everyone and it was the greatest deal since buying Manhattan from the Indians.
The parameters of this tax bill are completely trash. It punishes a lot of working people for no other reason than to pay off the wealthy. And, those in the middle class that do see a tax cut won’t see much unless they have children, which isn’t a tax cut at all it’s an increase in the child tax credit.
People like to believe Obamacare was about health insurance in some way. They seemed not to notice the ACA either initiated or increased taxes in 108 places. IOW... ACA was actually a "tax increase package". Whenever there is a change in tax policy... without a reduction in spending... someone benefits and someone else gets shafted. I expect my taxes to rise once again. Simply eliminating the SALT deduction (to fund lower corporate tax rates) will raise my Federal Income Tax by 5 figures. That, of course, is following my tax increase from ACA. No happy camper here.
Yes, it was a tax increase. In fact, as we may recall, that was the basis for the Supreme Court surprisingly ruling that congress had the power to force people to pay a penalty for not buying insurance. Justice Roberts- through convoluted, off-the-reservation thinking- ruled that it WAS ACTUALLY A TAX SO CONGRESS HAD THE AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT TAXES. I doubt that the mandate will get knocked out in the final tax version (last I checked it was out in the house bill but not the senate) but the great irony here would be if the mandate penalty did get removed in the final version of the tax bill. The libs are running around fuming and saying "how the hell can you use a tax bill to change a health care program?" Heh, well maybe because the Court ruled that it was a tax in the first place. Toto, I don't believe we are in Kansas anymore.
Yeah, no shit! I was hoping Obamacare would get repealed... not just for the mandate but along with its 108 tax increases. Chickenshit Roberts deserves to rot in Hell, too!
But think of all the jobs which will be magically created for the demand that doesn't exist. Any corporate tax cut needs to be directly tied to the hiring of new employees. No hiring, no tax cuts. Prove the need exists. Hiring comes first, as we've heard this line of shit before.
We don’t need more hiring, there’s plenty of jobs open and we are at full employment. We need a more educated workforce to fill higher paying jobs. We also need to raise the minimum wage to about $11 an hour.