Refugees create Global Warming - ban low carbon to high carbon migration

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Nov 18, 2015.

  1. jem

    jem

    Does the left understand that these refugees create more global warming as they start consuming at higher standards of living in the West.

    We need to eliminate immigration from lower carbon use areas to high carbon use area.
    If we don't act immediately on this Global Warming man made disaster... we will pass the trigger point and it will be too late.

    Lets build lower carbon humantarian refugee centers in low carbon use areas for the sake of Global Warming prevention.

    We need to build low carbon walls on the borders and only allow migration and repatriation from high carbon to low carbon areas.


    We have to act today. My projection is that otherwise the earth will get greener, and more co2 will be released and more people will be fed and it will get even worse. Standards of living and Carbon usage will go up all over the world.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2015
  2. jem

    jem

    Please lefties don't be alarmed by this data...
    Its only a massive difference in carbon footprints.
    no big deal if you don't accept man made global warming
    or you only scare people with it situationally to aid crony run govt.


    American carbon emission per capita was 5860.52
    Syrian carbon emission per capita was 50.99


    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/datablog/2009/sep/02/carbon-emissions-per-person-capita


    World carbon dioxide emissions from the consumption and flaring of fossil fuels, 1980-2006


    Country % | change since 1996 | Emissions per capita | 2006 | 2000 | 1992

    For instance in 2006

    American per capita was 5860.52
    Syria per capita was 50.99



    China 2475.26 2966.52 6017.69 4.58 105%
    United States 5079.53 5860.38 5902.75 19.78 7%
    Russia 2056.55 1582.37 1704.36 12 5%
    India 664.96 1012.34 1293.17 1.16 55%
    Japan 1078.48 1203.71 1246.76 9.78 10%
    Germany 896.37 856.92 857.6 10.4 -4%
    Canada 485.09 565.22 614.33 18.81 18%
    United Kingdom 579.82 561.23 585.71 9.66 -1%
    South Korea 294.53 445.81 514.53 10.53 27%
    Iran 234.79 320.69 471.48 7.25 79%
    Italy 415.62 448.43 468.19 8.05 10%
    South Africa 323.55 391.67 443.58 10.04 24%
    Mexico 313.55 383.44 435.6 4.05 31%
    Saudi Arabia 235.46 290.54 424.08 15.7 70%
    France 382.89 402.27 417.75 6.6 7%
    Australia 271.58 359.8 417.06 20.58 37%
    Brazil 237.8 344.91 377.24 2.01 23%
    Spain 254.21 326.92 372.62 9.22 52%
    Ukraine 535.94 326.83 328.72 7.05 -10%
    Poland 330.33 295 303.42 7.87 -13%
    Taiwan 132.27 252.15 300.38 13.19 52%
    Indonesia 173.45 273.93 280.36 1.21 18%
    Netherlands 213.2 251.73 260.45 15.79 14%
    Thailand 100.72 161.86 245.04 3.79 44%
    Turkey 138.1 202.38 235.7 3.35 39%
    Kazakhstan 265.09 143.45 213.5 14.02 50%
    Malaysia 72.93 112.14 163.53 6.7 61%
    Argentina 109.94 138.42 162.19 4.06 25%
    Venezuela 111.72 134.46 151.97 5.93 14%
    Egypt 93.83 119.32 151.62 1.92 40%
    United Arab Emirates 102.05 115.72 149.52 35.05 44%
    Belgium 124.8 148.57 147.58 14.22 3%
    Singapore 68.11 107.64 141.1 31.41 43%
    Pakistan 70.27 109.11 125.59 0.78 32%
    Uzbekistan 95.95 106.35 120.84 4.43 17%
    Czech Republic - - 113.45 116.3 11.36 -13%
    Greece 79.5 101.27 107.07 10.02 24%
    Nigeria 94.09 80.75 101.07 0.77 -1%
    Iraq 57.69 73.58 98.95 3.69 29%
    Romania 129.94 93.33 98.64 4.42 -22%
    Algeria 82.08 83.65 93.16 2.83 10%
    Vietnam 18.46 48.49 91.62 1.09 132%
    Hong Kong 45.4 55.93 84.86 12.23 74%
    North Korea 106.71 70.17 77.61 3.36 7%
    Austria 57.06 64.74 76.39 9.32 17%
    Kuwait 23.51 59.5 74.79 30.92 52%
    Philippines 46.16 71.17 72.39 0.81 20%
    Israel 41.99 60.68 67.33 9.8 35%
    Belarus 91.63 60.07 65.2 6.68 8%
    Chile 31.63 55.28 64.8 4.01 42%
    Colombia 53.82 57.83 62.04 1.42 9%
    Portugal 47.73 63.76 61.71 5.82 27%
    Denmark 61.63 54.72 59.13 10.85 -19%
    Hungary 62.74 55.86 58.65 5.88 -1%
    Finland 49.63 50.32 58.31 11.15 9%
    Sweden 59.08 60.78 57.37 6.36 -15%
    Qatar 25.59 34.7 54.17 61.19 75%
    Libya 36.56 41.89 53.51 9.07 28%
    Former Serbia and Montenegro 45.32 42.96 52.15 4.81 5%
    Syria 35.38 50.99 51.08 2.71 21%
    Turkmenistan 20.47 23.94 50.28 10.03 176%
    Bulgaria 57.64 49.11 48.94 6.63 -9%
    Trinidad and Tobago 17.4 27.51 47.23 44.32 95%
    Ireland 27.59 40.75 46.86 11.54 47%
    Switzerland 45.77 45.45 45.56 6.06 1%
    Norway 35.7 41.28 45.15 9.79 13%
    Bangladesh 16.51 29.38 42.74 0.29 88%
    Puerto Rico 23.35 27.72 41.43 10.55 71%
    Azerbaijan 60.14 43.76 39.82 4.94 2%
    New Zealand 31.27 35.13 38.36 9.38 18%
    Slovakia - - 36.56 38.15 7.01 -13%
    Oman 13.53 21.79 34.73 11.19 138%
    Morocco 22.54 31.25 34.53 1.04 26%
    Peru 20.15 26.97 29.93 1.05 16%
    Cuba 28.88 32.86 28.64 2.52 -5%
    Bahrain 13.57 20.26 26.85 38.44 69%
    Ecuador 18.39 20.08 25.46 1.88 29%
    Croatia 16.6 20.13 21.43 4.77 23%
    Angola 7.5 13.03 21.19 1.77 74%
    Tunisia 12.81 19.67 20.98 2.06 36%
    Jordan 11.2 15.63 19.89 3.37 40%
    Estonia 25.75 16.26 18.61 14.06 -5%
    Yemen 12.23 13.18 18.08 0.84 66%
    Slovenia 12.7 15.72 17.62 8.77 5%
    Dominican Republic 10.35 15.8 17.42 1.89 50%
    Bosnia and Herzegovina 18.91 14.13 17.41 3.87 284%
    Lithuania 23.28 13.28 15.73 4.39 -1%
    Panama 12.24 12.94 14.43 4.52 16%
    Lebanon 8.16 16.46 14.32 3.69 8%
    Burma 4.62 9.01 12.87 0.27 106%
    Virgin Islands, U.S. 8.35 9.85 12.85 118.3 51%
    Sri Lanka 5.63 11.33 12.54 0.61 56%
    Luxembourg 11.29 9.03 12.47 26.28 37%
    Bolivia 6.24 9.26 12.41 1.38 70%
    Sudan 5.17 6.51 12.26 0.32 209%
    Jamaica 8.52 10.83 12.03 4.36 19%
    Guatemala 4.36 9.07 11.23 0.9 78%
    Netherlands Antilles 9.55 11.62 10.9 49.13 -4%
    Kenya 6.57 8.7 10.79 0.3 44%
    Armenia 11.14 8.61 10.34 3.48 25%
    Zimbabwe 16.71 13.56 10.33 0.84 -31%
    Brunei 3.65 3.79 9.89 26.89 185%
    Cyprus 6.04 7.53 8.91 11.37 32%
    Latvia 12.77 7.35 8.74 3.84 -11%
    Mongolia 9.92 6.69 8.45 2.91 -3%
    Moldova 20.65 5.89 7.53 1.74 -20%
    Honduras 2.74 4.59 7.46 1.02 92%
    Tajikistan 7.97 5.95 7.36 1.06 56%
    Ghana 3.41 5.32 7.29 0.32 78%
    Macedonia 9.3 8.41 7.17 3.5 -27%
    Cameroon 3.59 6.83 7.16 0.41 6%
    Uruguay 4.52 6.52 6.36 1.85 28%
    Cote d'Ivoire (IvoryCoast) 3.86 7.36 6.3 0.36 10%
    El Salvador 3.22 5.51 6.28 0.92 43%
    Costa Rica 3.64 5.01 5.76 1.41 29%
    Senegal 2.92 4.43 5.73 0.47 46%
    Congo -Brazzaville 0.85 3.01 5.53 1.49 79%
    Ethiopia 3.64 3.46 5.13 0.07 199%
    Bahamas, The 2.22 3.5 5 16.48 40%
    Mozambique 1.19 1.28 4.98 0.24 365%
    Kyrgyzstan 14.07 7.23 4.95 0.95 -30%
    Equatorial Guinea 0.12 2.05 4.88 8.37 214%
    Albania 4.17 3.26 4.69 1.31 140%
    Tanzania 2.58 2.73 4.68 0.12 87%
    Georgia 15.51 4.63 4.66 1 -18%
    Papua New Guinea 2.58 2.6 4.66 0.82 74%
    Nicaragua 2.35 3.7 4.57 0.82 56%
    Gibraltar 3.09 7.3 4.47 160.22 38%
    Gabon 6.06 5.07 4.34 3.04 -22%
    Botswana 3.23 4.41 4.27 2.39 38%
    Mauritius 2.14 3.5 4.04 3.22 67%
    Paraguay 2.33 3.56 3.76 0.58 39%
    Iceland 2.32 3.18 3.44 11.5 25%
    Malta 2.38 2.91 3.11 7.78 19%
    Mauritania 3.31 3.24 3.03 0.95 -13%
    Nepal 1.11 3.11 3 0.11 80%
    Reunion 1.4 2.51 2.77 NA 48%
    Namibia 1.12 1.81 2.7 1.32 100%
    Benin 0.77 1.65 2.65 0.34 156%
    New Caledonia 1.78 2.01 2.6 11.85 42%
    Madagascar 1.07 1.81 2.59 0.14 102%
    Zambia 2.99 1.9 2.57 0.23 17%
    Togo 0.72 1.4 2.51 0.45 298%
    Democratic Republic of the Congo 4.35 2.71 2.51 0.04 -35%
    Martinique 1.47 2.06 2.39 NA 18%
    Macau 1.13 1.58 2.28 5.02 54%
    Guadeloupe 1.39 1.81 2.11 NA 24%
    Suriname 1.44 1.61 2.01 4.31 34%
    Djibouti 1.78 1.85 2 4.12 10%
    Guam 2.51 2.87 1.89 11.06 -41%
    Haiti 0.88 1.52 1.79 0.21 61%
     
  3. but won't importing more low carbon users decrease our cabon per capita?

    everyone should be monitored for their carbon use, and those who use the least should get preferred status for immigration

    of course. politicians and movie stars and environmental activists would all be exempt (because they are doing the Lords work.)
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2015
    traderob likes this.
  4. jem

    jem

    I think the the co2 crowd would prefer less carbon use to more... even if carbon per capita went down.

    I think monitoring carbon use is a way Gov't and the cronies who own it wish to control people's productivity and output. How could you ever grow to compete with a banker to buy a politician if you carbon output is capped.