Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Counties Can't Reject Mail-In Ballots When Signatures Don't Match

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Banjo, Oct 23, 2020.

  1. Banjo

    Banjo

  2. Wallet

    Wallet

  3. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Good. Who wants some redhat judging something subjective?
     
  4. Wallet

    Wallet

    I agree, why leave anything subjective? Have the damn thing notarized or present an ID when you vote in person.
     
    elderado likes this.
  5. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Ah yes, let's disenfranchise more people with poll taxes. Maybe take similar liberties with other constitutional liberties like gun ownership
     
  6. Wallet

    Wallet

    It’s against the law here to charge a fee to notarize a ballot. Your county voter registration/election board gives you a voter registration card with your name and party affiliation, free. You can present that or a picture ID when you vote.

    Where’s the monetary disadvantage?
     
  7. Ricter

    Ricter

    Hunting down a notary at a busy time, free or not, is excessive, particularly because the incidence of fraud is so low everywhere without that requirement.
     
    Cuddles likes this.
  8. Wallet

    Wallet

    You literally have weeks to get your early mail-in ballot signed sealed and delivered. Lame excuse.

    It makes a just and fair election
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2020
  9. Ricter

    Ricter

    We already have that. This is a solution in search of a problem.
     
  10. Wallet

    Wallet

    If every state ran their elections like Oklahoma there would not be an issue or hint of voter fraud.

    You approach leaves doubt.
     
    #10     Oct 23, 2020