https://scitechdaily.com/horrifying...popular-sugar-substitutes-worsen-your-memory/ Consuming low-calorie sweeteners also had an impact on the body’s metabolic signaling, which may result in diabetes and other metabolism-related diseases. Using laboratory models, scientists discovered that ingesting FDA-approved levels of saccharin, ACE-K, and stevia early in life may result in many changes to the body, including brain areas linked to memory and reward-motivated behavior. Early-life high-sugar diets have been linked to impaired brain function, but what about low-calorie sugar substitutes? According to recent research, they could have a negative impact on the developing gut and brain. The News Researchers from the University of Southern California Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences report that adolescents who consumed the low-calorie sweeteners saccharin, ACE-K, and stevia showed long-term memory impairments in a study that was recently published in the journal JCI Insight. The results are consistent with other studies that demonstrated sustained memory impairment in adolescent rats who consume sugar. Consuming low-calorie sweeteners also affected metabolic signaling in the body, which can lead to diabetes and other metabolism-related diseases. Rats that ate low-calorie sweeteners as adolescents were less inclined to work for sugar as adults, but they ate more sugar if it was readily accessible, which is another factor that may influence the chance of developing metabolic disease. Why It Matters There is a broad range of advice on what to eat and when to consume it. According to the researchers, information from studies like these may aid consumers and medical professionals in making better decisions at all stages of life. “While our findings do not necessarily indicate that someone should not consume low-calorie sweeteners in general, they do highlight that habitual low-calorie sweetener consumption during early life may have unintended, long-lasting impacts,” said Scott Kanoski, associate professor of biological sciences at USC <span class="st">Founded in 1880, the <em>University of Southern California</em> is one of the world's leading private research universities. It is located in the heart of Los Angeles.</span> " data-gt-translate-attributes="[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-image: initial; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; border-bottom: 1px dotted rgb(0, 0, 0) !important;">USC Dornsife. What It Means for Humans While most studies of low-calorie sweeteners focus on one substance and use amounts far exceeding the norm, the researchers made sure the study was in line with real-life conditions for people. Sweeteners tested include saccharin, acesulfame potassium (ACE-K) and stevia — which are commonly used in sweetened foods. The amount of sweetener consumed fell within FDA-approved guidelines for humans. In Their Words “Research using rodent models and low-calorie sweeteners has typically involved consumption levels that far exceed the FDA ‘acceptable daily intake’ (ADI) levels and used only a single sweetener. To design our research to be more applicable to humans, we kept consumption levels within the ADI and used multiple low-calorie sweeteners to determine if effects were specific to a given sweetener or general across sweeteners.” — Lindsey Schier, Gabilan Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences at USC Dornsife The Experiment To determine the effect of low-calorie sweetener consumption on memory, the researchers used methods that test object recognition and spatial recognition. Rats were provided water sweetened with either stevia, ACE-K or saccharin or plain water, along with their normal food. After a month, the rats’ memory was tested using two different methods — one tests if they remember an object they’ve seen before and the other is a maze. In the end, rats consuming sweetener were less likely to remember an object or the path through the maze than those that drank only plain water. What Else? The scientists also found other effects among the rats after they consumed sweeteners. They had fewer receptors on their tongues that detect sweet taste. The biological mechanism in their intestines that transports glucose into the blood was altered. Their brains had changed, specifically in regions associated with memory control and reward-motivated behavior. What’s Next? Kanoski and Schier say the findings reveal more questions worth exploring, including: How do sweetener substitutes cause a reduction in sweet taste receptors and how does that affect later dietary behavior? What does the change in the nutrient transport in the gut mean for health? What biological mechanisms link sweetener consumption with the changes to the brain? The researchers say they intend to explore ways to reverse the long-lasting effects of adolescent low-calorie sweetener consumption and to study how it influences food choices and preferences later in life.
%% THAT sounds right; but i seldom believe anti-egg propaganda Especially if some are farm fresh eggs, yolks are very yellow,
If you eggsamine the article objeggtively, you would see it is eggsclusively about sugar substitutes. Maybe you were thinking about this
%% I should have used 2 sentences, for clarity, since those 2 foods are so different. So now i make it about the good , bad + ugly, but use one contrasting sentence. That sounds accurate about the bad sugar substitute article; in contrast, good + good for you are farm fresh eggs.
"What I've learned" - an interesting youtube channel with frequent videos on the subject of sugar. Basically sugar is worse than cocaine. No wonder sugar substitutes have negative effects as well.