New Start-Up Exchanges Should Help, Not Hurt CME Group

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by ajacobson, Jun 29, 2021.

  1. ajacobson

    ajacobson

  2. Overnight

    Overnight

  3. maxinger

    maxinger

    The title gives you the clue that the article is worthless.

    So Don't click the link !!
     
  4. qlai

    qlai

    Why?
     
  5. guru

    guru

    The title seems incorrect or misleading.
    The article talks about new disruptive micro-futures exchanges with low fees, which would be a threat to CME, if not for the need to use CME by traders arbitraging between CME and those new exchanges, just like they do arbitraging between hundreds of crypto exchanges. So the new startup futures exchanges may not be as bad for CME as it may seem.
     
  6. VEGASDESERT

    VEGASDESERT

    cme needs more competition, their fees are outrageous.

    just look at their stock price, tells you all you need to know..
     
    comagnum likes this.
  7. ajacobson

    ajacobson

    One of CME's biggest assets is monopoly clearing making the products, at this time nonfungible
     
  8. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    Trading on CME, you face 0 counter party risk. Fees are reasonable.
     
  9. VEGASDESERT

    VEGASDESERT

    fees are reasonable for hedging not trading.

    99.9999% of traders can't overcome cme fees (and commish) over the long term. prove me wrong.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2021
  10. Overnight

    Overnight

    Anyone who trades stocks at a zero commish broker. Tag, you're it! *runs away and slams door*
     
    #10     Jun 29, 2021