MUELLER 'SOFT-PEDALED' PROBE EMBARRASSING TO HILLARY...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ThunderThor, Oct 24, 2017.

  1. [​IMG]
    --------------------------------------
    The FBI’s Political Meddling

    Mueller is the wrong sleuth when his ex-agency is so tangled up with Russia.


    [​IMG]
    Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, now special counsel on the Russia investigation, following a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting on Capitol Hill, June 21. PHOTO: SAUL LOEB/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES
    [​IMG]
    By
    Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.
    Oct. 24, 2017 6:17 p.m. ET
    187 COMMENTS


    Let’s give plausible accounts of the known facts, then explain why demands that Robert Mueller recuse himself from the Russia investigation may not be the fanciful partisan grandstanding you imagine.

    Here’s a story consistent with what has been reported in the press—how reliably reported is uncertain. Democratic political opponents of Donald Trump financed a British former spook who spread money among contacts in Russia, who in turn over drinks solicited stories from their supposedly “connected” sources in Moscow. If these people were really connected in any meaningful sense, then they made sure the stories they spun were consistent with the interests of the regime, if not actually scripted by the regime.

    The resulting Trump dossier then became a factor in Obama administration decisions to launch an FBI counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign, and after the election to trumpet suspicions of Trump collusion with Russia.

    We know of a second, possibly even more consequential way the FBI was effectively a vehicle for Russian meddling in U.S. politics. Authoritative news reports say FBI chief James Comey’s intervention in the Hillary Clinton email matter was prompted by a Russian intelligence document that his colleagues suspected was a Russian plant.

    OK, Mr. Mueller was a former close colleague and leader but no longer part of the FBI when these events occurred. This may or may not make him a questionable person to lead a Russia-meddling investigation in which the FBI’s own actions are necessarily a concern.


    But now we come to the Rosatom disclosures last week in The Hill, a newspaper that covers Congress.

    Here’s another story as plausible as we can make it based on credible reporting. After the Cold War, in its own interest, the U.S. wanted to build bridges to the Russian nuclear establishment. The Putin government, for national or commercial purposes, agreed and sought to expand its nuclear business in the U.S.

    The purchase and consolidation of certain assets were facilitated by Canadian entrepreneurs who gave large sums to the Clinton Foundation, and perhaps arranged a Bill Clinton speech in Moscow for $500,000. A key transaction had to be approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

    Now we learn that, before and during these transactions, the FBI had uncovered a bribery and kickback scheme involving Russia’s U.S. nuclear business, and also received reports of Russian officials seeking to curry favor through donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    This criminal activity was apparently not disclosed to agencies vetting the 2010 transfer of U.S. commercial nuclear assets to Russia. The FBI made no move to break up the scheme until long after the transaction closed. Only five years later, the Justice Department, in 2015, disclosed a plea deal with the Russian perpetrator so quietly that its significance was missed until The Hill reported on the FBI investigation last week.

    For anyone who cares to look, the real problem here is that the FBI itself is so thoroughly implicated in the Russia meddling story.

    The agency, when Mr. Mueller headed it, soft-pedaled an investigation highly embarrassing to Mrs. Clinton as well as the Obama Russia reset policy. More recently, if just one of two things is true—Russia sponsored the Trump Dossier, or Russian fake intelligence prompted Mr. Comey’s email intervention—then Russian operations, via their impact on the FBI, influenced and continue to influence our politics in a way far more consequential than any Facebook ad, the preoccupation of John McCain, who apparently cannot behold a mountain if there’s a molehill anywhere nearby.

    Which means that Mr. Mueller has the means, motive and opportunity to obfuscate and distract from matters embarrassing to the FBI, while pleasing a large part of the political spectrum. He need only confine his focus to the flimsy, disingenuous but popular (with the media) accusation that the shambolic Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin.


    Mr. Mueller’s tenure may not have bridged the two investigations, but James Comey’s, Rod Rosenstein’s , Andrew Weissmann’s , and Andrew McCabe’s did. Mr. Rosenstein appointed Mr. Mueller as special counsel. Mr. Weissmann now serves on Mr. Mueller’s team. Mr. McCabe remains deputy FBI director. All were involved in the nuclear racketeering matter and the Russia meddling matter.

    Let’s stop here. All this needs to be sorted out, but not in a spirit of panic and hysteria. We are a prosperous, successful country, in pretty good shape right now by historical standards, even if our officials behave in the frequently dubious, self-interested way they always have.

    But still: By any normal evidentiary, probative or journalistic measure, the big story here is the FBI—its politicized handling of Russian matters, and not competently so.

    To put it bluntly, whatever its hip-pocket rationales along the way, the FBI would not have so much to cover up now if it had not helped give us Mrs. Clinton as Democratic nominee and then, in all likelihood, inadvertently helped Mr. Trump to the presidency.

    Appeared in the October 25, 2017, print edition.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fbis-political-meddling-1508883468
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2017
    Optionpro007 and jem like this.
  2. Mueller needs to be locked up.
     
    ThunderThor likes this.
  3. elderado

    elderado

    So does all the evidence.

    If it hasn't already left the building in someone's socks!
     
  4. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    I remember all the cries of how this would be "bigger than Watergate" from those on the left, and how I laughed at the idea. Well, turns out they may be right. Just not in the way they thought.
     
    traderob, Optionpro007 and jem like this.
  5. jem

    jem

    finally the truth is being reported in the establishment media.




     
    ThunderThor likes this.
  6. jem

    jem

    ThunderThor likes this.
  7. So Hillary's campaign paid for a fake dossier which the Obama administration then used to get warrants to wiretap the Trump campaign, which they then leaked to Hillary's campaign and the media, but of course that is redundant.

    I'm sure there is an innocent explanation for this. Just like there is for the uranium deal and its $140 mill in contributions to the Clinton Crime Foundation and $500k in walking around money for Bill Clinton. Just like there is for the email server scandal. And the destruction of email scandal. And Debbie Wasserman's-Schultz' Pakistani IT crew.

    Amazingly the media is not the least bit interested in any of it. Not when Trump supposedly offended a black woman and her grandstanding congresswoman.
     
    ThunderThor, Tom B and jem like this.
  8. jem

    jem

    and we can't get jeff sessions and the DOJ to do a damn thing about it.

    by now we know that the New York office must have threatened the shit out of comey to get him to reverse course on Hillary. So why is the doj not talking to the new your office of the fbi and getting to the bottom of this fast.

    If comey of mueller are really good guys... lets find out. Right now this is not looking good for any of them. Its all over drudge.

    The guy winning... Putin. People losing... american tax payers.
    Why... the swamp allowed the clintions and the dnc and Obama to be this crooked.
     
  9. jem

    jem

    its even worse... and its has pakistani ties and muslim brotherhood ties.

    could not one person in this swamp know right from wrong?


    http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017...-latest-clinton-russia-collusion-revelations/
    ...
    “It turns out that as this so-called Uranium One transaction was being considered by CFIUS for approval – this was, of course, the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium stocks to the Russians – and the voting on that idea was going to be conducted by, among others, Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder – then the Attorney General of the United States, she was the Secretary of State of course – Hillary Clinton was taking in, either personally or through her husband or through her foundation, $145 million dollars from Russian interests associated with this transaction,” he continued.

    “And Eric Holder knew that! The Mueller team knew it at the FBI, Comey, McCabe, others, and Rod Rosenstein. This is scandalous in the first order. They did nothing to prevent this transaction. It went through. The Clintons were enriched. We sold, I believe, national security assets in the form of this uranium to Russians,” Gaffney charged.

    “And CFIUS – get this – at the same time this was going down, a guy who was the staff director in effect of this organization, a fellow by the name of Amin Mir, is a Pakistani expat with sharia supremacist ties both personal and familial, including to the Muslim Brotherhood,” he added.

    “Now, you’ve just got to ask yourself, as the Pakistanis are all over this saga with the Capitol Hill Democrats IT scandal, who is in charge of actually monitoring what’s in the national security interests of the United States? Certainly not CFIUS. Certainly not the Attorney General, or the Secretary of State, or for that matter President Obama himself during this critical period of time,” he said.

    Gaffney called for “public hearings, as well as investigations,” which he deemed likely to result in “criminal prosecution of at least some of these individuals.”

    “At the bare minimum, they cannot in good faith proceed with their own investigations now underway – again, without evidence of actual collusion by the Trump campaign with the Russians,” he said. “It is high time that the Washington Post get around to covering this. I’m delighted that they are. But let’s be honest, Raheem: this saga would not have gotten the attention that it has, finally, were it not for the work that you guys at Breitbart and the Daily Caller and others have been doing on it. It has to now go to the next step for sure on Capitol Hill.”
     
  10. Jeff Sessions caved in to the liberal elite.

    President Trump has every reason to be pissed at Jeff Sessions for recusing himself from any investigation involving Hitlary.

    So Rosenstein appoints dirty Mueller as special counsel to oversee the investigation and on top of that,they are all in cahoots with the dems/liberals.

    Sessions was the weak link
     
    #10     Oct 25, 2017