<B>Chancellor George Osborne cements London as renminbi hub</B> By Lucy Hornby in Beijing and Patrick Jenkins in London October 15, 2013 10:14 pm George Osborne, UK chancellor, moved on Tuesday to cement Londonâs position as a global hub for Chinaâs currency, announcing investment quotas, foreign exchange trading and relaxed requirements for Chinese banks in the city. Mr Osborneâs belief that the renminbi will become a major global economy is behind Tuesdayâs gambit, a move which he hopes will make London âa home of Chinese banks, Chinese bonds and Chinese financeâ. Tuesday's announcement of China's agreement to open up its markets for British-based investors represents its latest move to establish the yuan as one of the world's heavyweight currencies and underscores Britain's determination to win a large share of the potentially massive Chinese market. HSBC forecast in March that the currency will be fully convertible within five years and that a third of Chinaâs total trade will be settled in yuan by 2015, making it one of the top three global trade settlement currencies by volume. As the chancellor confirmed details of his mission to boost the UKâs status as an offshore Chinese financial centre, including a plan for Chinese banks to operate via branches rather than full-blown subsidiaries, senior US bank executives were stunned. âIt is extraordinary to treat Chinese banks differently,â said one bank chief. âItâs very inconsistent. This is just a crazy lovefest.â http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9579f608-35...s/0/1b00d4da-35c5-11e3-b539-00144feab7de.html
When the Renminbi is freely convertible, that's when the USD apocalypse is nigh. Rats will shortly jump ship.
at 17 trillion that is 123,000 per american. with unfounded liabilities... we are at 5 times that. A very large percentage of that debt piled on in the last generation while the baby boomers have been in control. the fact that the fed has to buy a large percentage of our debt... is a big clue... that the spending has gone into the loony, crazy, only an extremist or fool could support it zone.
But Ricter believes we didn't "borrow and spend enough" and he's too stupid to realize that the artificially low rates weren't a function of the "free markets".