and Susan Rice and Comey and Clapper and McCabe and Samantha Powers and...and...and... Barr says familiar names among those DOJ is investigating in Durham probe, calls findings 'very troubling' "And, you know, there's the old saying that that the wheels of justice grind slow and they do run slow because we have due process and we follow the process. But people should not draw from the fact that no action has been taken that taken yet, that that means that people or people are going to get away with wrongdoing." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ba...ng-those-doj-is-investigating-in-durham-probe
John Brennan is going to prison. The only question is whether he will be charged with treason or perjury + obstruction. The timing though... epic. If you think liberals are freaking out at the moment you haven't seen anything yet.
"Former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Powersought to obtain Flynn's redacted identity on at least seven occasions, according to newly declassified list of names from the intelligence community -- even though Power testified under oath before the House Intelligence Committee that she had “no recollection” of ever making such a request even once." Samantha Powers - Ambassador to the UN had a sudden need to do repetitive unmasking requests on Flynn even though she is not in an intel agency and if she needed it for intel purposes would normally request it from the intel agency rather than access the database herself. One or two of her requests were done in less than 48 hours before Trump was sworn in. I guess she was taking care of important bidness on the way out. Her explanation for all of this: "I KNOW NOTHING." womp.....womp...womp.
They will have more than one opportunity to get him on misuse or unlawful release of classified data.
James Clapper: 'I don’t recall what prompted a request' made on my behalf to unmask Flynn https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...d-a-request-made-on-my-behalf-to-unmask-flynn
Carry on fishing. Federal judge who accused Barr of ‘distorting’ the Mueller report has read an unredacted version — and now he’s demanding some answers June 9, 2020 The Mueller report hasn’t been in the headlines much in 2020, a year that has found reporters heavily focused on the Ukraine scandal, President Donald Trump’s acquittal on two articles of impeachment, the coronavirus pandemic, former Vice President Joe Biden’s surge in the Democratic presidential primary and — most recently — the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis on May 25. But the Mueller report is still a compelling read, and a federal judge is demanding some answers after confirming, on June 8, that he has read an unredacted version of the lengthy document. U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, according to Law & Crime’s Matt Naham, has ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to answer questions “regarding certain redactions of the Mueller Report” at a hearing now set for July 20. In the past, Walton has been critical of Attorney General William Barr’s response to the Mueller Report, asserting that Barr, in 2019, “distorted” the findings of former special counsel Robert Mueller. And now that Walton has read the Mueller Report in unredacted form, he is more concerned than ever about Barr’s response to it. Because of the coronavirus pandemic, Walton — like so many other Americans — has been working remotely. But the judge, Naham notes, has “made clear that he has some questions that the DOJ cannot answer remotely.” Walton asserted, “Having reviewed the unredacted version of the Mueller Report, the court cannot assess the merits of certain redactions without further representations from the Department (of Justice). However, because the court must discuss the substance of the redactions with the Department, and because such a discussion cannot occur remotely due to the lack of a secure connection between the Court and the Department…. the status conference currently scheduled for June 18, 2020, is VACATED.” With Walton having “vacated” the June 18 conference, he has ordered the DOJ to appear at the July 20 hearing in order to “address the court’s questions regarding certain redactions of the Mueller Report.”