inb4 MAGA https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...urce=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf Trump Allies ‘Openly’ Talk About Jay Sekulow Being ‘Rewarded’ with Supreme Court Nomination If you thought the Brett Kavanaugh hearings were a disaster, picture what Supreme Court confirmation hearings would be like for President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer through the Mueller probe and impeachment: charity mogul and radio host Jay Sekulow. There’s no way this could possibly happen, right? Well, last election the Supreme Court (i.e., abortion, 2A, etc.) was a deciding factor for many people who voted for Trump. It’s not out of the question that Trump and his campaign will argue again on the 2020 campaign trail that he ought to be re-elected in the event that another space on the Supreme Court bench needs filling. They will tout the conservative bona fides of appointees Neil Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. But Sekulow joining those ranks–really? Trump allies have “openly” discussed this and former Trump lawyer in the Mueller probe John Dowd talked up Sekulow’s qualifications, Politico reported on Thursday. Per the story, these allies talk about this with varying levels of seriousness, seemingly meaning: some take it very seriously and some not so much. The aforementioned Dowd went as far as to say that Sekulow would be a “terrific” Supreme Court justice and is “certainly qualified” for a position on the nation’s highest court: Sekulow juggles both legal and religious charitable enterprises — work that has recently come under scrutiny — and that will assuredly benefit from his heightened profile. His friends and allies even talk openly, with varying levels of seriousness, about Trump rewarding his 63-year-old attorney a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. “He’s certainly qualified,” said John Dowd, a former Trump personal attorney who worked with Sekulow on special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe and remains close friends with his former colleague. “He’d be a terrific Supreme Court justice.”
"It’s not out of the question that Trump and his campaign will argue again on the 2020 campaign trail that he ought to be re-elected in the event that another space on the Supreme Court bench needs filling. " "Not out of the question?" What planet they been on? Have they never seen a Trump rally? They might want to get outside the Beltway a little now and then. We know that if it is a close vote on any supreme court nominee that we can count on Mitt to vote against it. Being butthurt will be his legacy.
You white privileged sexist pigs are not even considering Pam Bondi. C'mon. Let's get woke. If Trump nominates a woman the dems will all line right up to support her right? Or not.
I would not prefer Amy because she has a history of virtue signalling and some other things that the left usually does. Women are very sympathetic to criminals, illegal immigrants and they are usually emotionally driven.