Yes, there is a new IPCC report coming out at the end of the week. Let's preemptively give you the news. The IPCC says you need to panic now, not later. The world is coming to an end due to global warming. Climate Report Predicts Dire Threats for People, Including Food, Water Shortages http://www.weather.com/news/science...4?hootPostID=1e8f238268d538316651f2b3f27de10d "A planet warmed by human-produced greenhouse gases poses significant risks already to people, cities and nations today and not just in the far-off future, according to a report the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will release at the end of this week. And those risks could mean "abrupt or drastic changes" that could lead to unstoppable and irreversible climate shifts like the runaway melting of Greenland's glacial ice or the rapid drying out of South America's Amazon rainforest." Yes, despite having no scientific evidence to support their assertions, the IPCC has doubled-down and gone full bat-shiat alarmist.
Oh shit! Look out below for the trolling future queer, and his other (two) followers. They'll be here soon to call names, and post up outrageously flawed nonsense.
It just continues to amaze me....how fucking stupid stupid you denialist morons are. It's like some religion to you. Climate change deniers are as committed. Their denial fits perfectly with their support for free market economics, opposition to state intervention and hatred of all those latte-slurping, quinoa-munching liberals, with their arrogant manners and dainty hybrid cars, who presume to tell honest men and women how to live. If they admitted they were wrong on climate change, they might have to admit that they were wrong on everything else and their whole political identity would unravel.
LOL!!!!!! Bro, you're like a professional bass fisherman! You threw the "bait" out there, and even though he's on ignore, like clockwork, current queer shows up with whatever temper tantrum he can throw. Classic! And fwiw, I think you could call current queer's mother a whore, and that would be fine as long as you didn't say anything about his science fictional global warming.
If they admitted they were wrong on climate change, they might have to admit that they were wrong on everything else and their whole political identity would unravel. Hurts to see the truth huh douchebag?
An old four minute cartoon...... very apropos, "The Sky is Falling" Four main points from the cartoon; 1. To Influence the masses aim first at the least intelligent. 2. When you tell a lie, don't tell a small one - tell a BIG one. 3. By the use of flattery insignificant people can be made to look upon themselves as born leaders. 4. Don't believe everything you read <iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/LYgOFqpRIlA?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
"The panel won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, months after it issued its last report." LOL. Next year they might win the Nobel Peace Prize again months before the report is issued.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science came as close as such a respectable institution can to screaming an alarm last week. "As scientists, it is not our role to tell people what they should do," it said as it began one of those sentences that you know will build to a "but". "But human-caused climate risks abrupt, unpredictable and potentially irreversible changes." In other words, the most distinguished scientists from the country with the world's pre-eminent educational institutions were trying to shake humanity out of its complacency.
The problem sensible people have with all this is not the notion that green house gasses might influence the climate. No one can really be comfortable with pumping all these products into the atmosphere. The problem however is the models have consistently overstated the effects. The models do not work on historicla data, forget future predictions. When these "inconvenient facts" are pointed out, the reaction is not to try to reach common groundf or undertand the models' deficiencies. It is rather to attack those who point out the defects and try to marginalize them or even intimidate them into silence. Of course, we immediately recognize that as a standard tactic of the liberals and hard left to avoid debate on any number of issues where their case is weak. As a consequence, the whole AGW camp loses credibility. The whole process now is no longer scientific. it has become totallyt political. Liberals want to get the same kind of control over energy use theyhave over health care. The international "community", ie thrid world countries, wants money from the west, chiefly the US. Lost in the debate is the indisputable fact that nothing we can within the realm of reason will effect so-called greenhouse gas production enough to have a material effect. So like third graders forgoing water bottles or whatever other idiotic gestures they are forced to make, our efforts would be merely a futile gesture, only at the cost of destroying our economy.