https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-c...obstruction-justice-sources/story?id=56973384 Was thinking the news that drove him crazy today were about indictments.
You know by the time they get around to questioning people in investigations like this they already know what they have on them and it is more of a chance to get more info, catch them in perjury or leverage the subject to give up someone else. I don’t see Trump as having any other option though and I don’t know why Mueller is playing ball with him on the line of questions. If they don’t like the questions, fine, sit him in front of the grand jury.
Heh. As usual, you have it bass ackwards. Mueller is finding out that he is the one without options. He either has to go with the limited scope that Trump will agree to or else Trump/Guliani will just do nothing. Oh, and please, we do not have to have that "sit him in front of the grand jury" discussion ad nasuem do we? By all means, just go for it. There is a reason he has not done that so far, eh? Go for it.
I see you’re back to your old ways. Mueller can subpoena Trump and that is resolved in US v Nixon. Stop getting your legal analysis from judge Judy.
Excuse me, that last reply should read Judge Jeanine, not Judge Judy. Judge Judy is actually kind of thoughtful.
I think I have said beaucoup times, that I am cheering him on to do that. Oh, better hurry up too. Kavanaugh is about to be nominated and we already know what his view is.
Mueller could just be baiting him to incriminate himself as he just did. Don't really think it would count as entrapment either.
No doubt that when Maxine Waters is elected President, she will appoint Alexandra Ocommie-o-Cortez to the court. That is what will be needed to support the views of your ilk.