Together, we’re going to Google the phrase “trump no evidence collusion.” (And because Google searches change over time, I’ll drop screenshots of my results here.) What will emerge is a picture of an invisible hand writing a specific argument, over and over and over. That hand belongs to Robert Mercer, Trump’s data man, who gamed Google and fake news during the campaign and whose return to the scene is heralded by Trump’s war room and bot boom… Before we begin, though, we need to establish the fact that this statement is a lie: “There’s no evidence of collusion!” The reason I’m using this specific example is because this highly nuanced claim is the perfect loophole to exploit for misinformation, to shade the truth as lie and get away with it clean… Here’s what I saw when I Googled “trump no evidence collusion” on the afternoon of May 29… How many mainstream sites do you see on the first page? Zero. Let’s go to page two… Ah! There, buried under InfoWars and National Review and The Blaze and not one, not two, but three pieces from The Free Beacon, we finally find good old Reuters! And, lo: the good old Washington Post! https://www.pastemagazine.com/artic...rump-russia-data-machine-games-google-to.html Now you know why all the Cons were repeating 'NO EVIDENCE' verbatim as if they were trained to say it
Total bullshit. We are repeating what has been stated and presented to date. Clapper stated several times that he saw NO evidence while on liberal media outlets. Do you think that Clapper is disseminating fake news while on CNN and MSNBC? Is that what you are attempting to prove? The only thing that the above illustrates is a bias media. Liberal media reporting that there just had to be collusion and conservative media posting the FACT that there has been NO actual evidence presented or leaked of collusion. The FAKE news are articles that infer or state that there was collusion with Russia. That is absolutely fake because no evidence has been presented. This is a great illustration of what you and liberals do to spread fake news. With the continuous leaks, don't you think that if there was evidence it would have been leaked? Or, are the people leaking that are trying to take down Trump holding back the one smoking gun that would actually allow them to reach their goal? Does Mercer also write for Real Clear Politics? I searched "Trump evidence of collusion". Here is the screen shot.
"After a year of record traffic and digital advertising revenue, the Post newsroom will grow by more than 8 percent, to more than 750 people. The extent of the newsroom expansion was first reported by Politico. The Post will add a "rapid-response" investigative team, expand its video journalism and breaking news staff, and make additional investments in podcasts and photography." http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ng-washington-post-to-add-sixty-newsroom-jobs
Then the internet is not fair. Somebody should do something about it. Until then I will still never read anything filtered through the Washington Post, even if it is at the top of the list.
The internet is not fair because right wingers are gaming it, cheating is in their blood (see Trump University Dean)