Lindsay Graham, I’m looking at you: Some Trump-tards will cry the democrats are abusing their investigatory powers. Oh boo-hoo. Next time don’t nominate a criminal. Duh.
Oh, so they want to go back into Mueller stuff? Beautiful. That creates a basis and precedent for the Senate to do the same and use the senate trial as a forum for hashing over horowitz and durham material as it is released and developed. Be careful Tards. You are not all that smart.
Its not like they have to pick one thing with this dirtbag. The House has cleared 321 bills waiting for the Republican senate who not involved in impeachment yet, WTF is Mitch doing? https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bi...rrent_status[]=4&terms=__ALL__&terms2=__ALL__
Maybe we should assign an independent counsel with unlimited funds and unlimited staff to investigate Trump for a couple years. Just a thought.
I’d like to remind you that you’re the guy that thinks Samantha Powers runs the deep state. Let the senate investigate the Obama years. Lol.
Nope. I have consistently mentioned her as part of the cabal that includes brennan, rice, clapper, rosenstein, mccabe, Sally Yates, and Obama. I see that that is too much detail for your binary mind though. So you just picked one.
VS Bone Spurs' decision to skip a ceremony honoring fallen American World War I soldiers in France on Saturday because of the rain.... And any number of times he only holds the umbrella over himself when whore number 1 is around. Has to so his hair does not flap will be LacesOut's excuse, we know.
This seems to be a strong case House lawyers disclosed the investigation into Trump’s written responses in September, saying in a court filing that materials from the Mueller report could show Trump was not honest about his knowledge of his campaign’s contacts with WikiLeaks, which published emails hacked from the Democratic Party. The redacted Mueller report materials “have direct bearing on whether the president was untruthful, and further obstructed the special counsel’s investigation, when in providing written responses to the special counsel’s questions he denied being aware of any communications between his campaign and WikiLeaks,” the House lawyers said in the filing. Last week, Trump’s former deputy campaign chairman, Rick Gates, suggested in testimony during a jury trial in a criminal case that Trump talked to longtime adviser Roger Stone about WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign. Gates testified that after finishing a July 2016 call from Stone, Trump indicated that “more information would be coming,” in an apparent reference to WikiLeaks. Gates’ testimony appeared to conflict with sworn written statements that Trump gave Mueller. In Trump’s written responses to Mueller, he said he could not recall discussing WikiLeaks with Stone. “I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with him,” Trump wrote. “Nor do I recall being aware of Mr. Stone having discussed WikiLeaks with individuals associated with my campaign.”