Hillary's Foreign policy positions

Discussion in 'Politics' started by fan27, Sep 1, 2014.

  1. fan27

    fan27

    So Hillary Clinton voted for the Iraq war but claimed in her book that she thought it was a great mistake. My question is how can that be a mistake but helping to take out Gaddafi in Lybia,which she was a part of, not a mistake? She was also in favor of arming the "moderate" Syrian rebels to take out Assad. Was it not obvious from Iraq that deposing a dictator creates a power vacuum? Or is deposing the dictator OK as long as we do not use our own troops? I am curious how she is going to spin this in 2016.

    fan27
     
  2. She won't have to spin anything,
    the media will be fully focused on the Republican candidate.


    go and tell that kangaroo eater at Fox to grow his useless journos a pair.
     
  3. jem

    jem

    hillary is a terrible candiate. she is probably spending 4 hours a day trying to learn how to project being nice. but I suspect she is like the scorpion on the back of the turtle.

    when you couple that with her inability to even list one accomplishment... you have problems.
     
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Problems with some moderates/independents, sure. The dumb fuck shit for brains fanatic bleeding heart progressives absolutely adore her no matter how bad she obviously is.
     
  5. The parasites would vote for Charles Manson if he were on the DemoCrap ticket.... they vote who they are... parasite class... nothing else matters.

    If the Dems want a guaranteed win, they should run that Maxine Waters CUNT!

    :(
     
    Lucrum likes this.
  6. loyek590

    loyek590

    she may be a bad candidate now. Even democrats criticize her. That proves they are open minded, independent and not biased. But once she becomes the nominee, they will fanatically unite and rally around her. They always do. There is no sense in carrying on any kind of debate or discussion with a democrat in an election year. You might as well be talking price to a used car salesman.

    Her ace in the hole is 5 tv networks need her, due to the fact that she is penis challenged. We've never had a president without a penis. Obama had his birthers. Don't be surprised if the right wing claims there is no proof she doesn't have a penis.
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2014
  7. jem

    jem

    an interesting candidate like Paul or Cruz could bring union guys and or anti war and jobs at home first before amnesty kind of people over the line.
     
  8. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    And if you leave your tooth under your pillow . . .
     
  9. jem

    jem

    if I leave a tooth under my pillow... I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth. This was the moment - this was the time - when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves, and our highest ideals. Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.
     
  10. Let's not drink too much media kool aid here. Hillary is a terrible candidate, She's won one election in her life, in clueless NY as a consolation prize for standing by her dirtbag husband.

    She is unlikeable to the extreme. She has a trail of corruption, obstruction of justice and a disastrous tour as Secretary of State. Plus, she is getting older every day.

    If the republicans can't beat her they should go into another line of work.
     
    #10     Sep 2, 2014