First drys. Ok, maybe there was a need for info. Give it the benefit of the doubt. Then the momo boys piled into dcix and they halted it, too? Starting to look like they just don't want a stock to go vertical.
Hey, zdreg, do you know how to reply to a post? After 10000 of your own posts, i'd expect you to at least be that smart. I haven't found the code for dcix, but for drys, they used a code that did not reflect fast stock movement. Why are you chiding me for not knowing something that you yourself are clearly ignorant of?
what are you talking about? i gave you factually correct info. dcix had ten volatility halts for fast stock movements.
I was just trying to give zdreg advice about how he's quoting posts. Something weird is going on. I'm having trouble too.