GW political idiot spins "science" story

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Eight, Aug 13, 2013.

  1. Eight

    Eight

    How's this for some conflicting s%^t from a "science" article? "Although the NOAA report noted that in 2012, “the Arctic continues to warm” with “sea ice reaching record lows,” it also stated that the Antarctica sea ice “reached a record high of 7.51 million square miles” on Sept. 26, 2012."

    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/what-global-warming-2012-data-confirms-earth-cooling-trend

    (CNSNews.com) – The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recently released its “State of the Climate in 2012” report, which states that “worldwide, 2012 was among the 10 warmest years on record.”
    But the report “fails to mention [2012] was one of the coolest of the decade, and thus confirms the cooling trend,” according to an analysis by climate blogger Pierre Gosselin.

    “To no one’s surprise, the report gives the reader the impression that warming is galloping ahead out of control,” writes Gosselin. “But their data shows just the opposite.”

    Although the NOAA report noted that in 2012, “the Arctic continues to warm” with “sea ice reaching record lows,” it also stated that the Antarctica sea ice “reached a record high of 7.51 million square miles” on Sept. 26, 2012.

    And the latest figures for this year show that there’s been a slowdown of melting in the Arctic this summer as well, with temperatures at the North Pole well below normal for this time of year. Meteorologist Joe Bastardi calls it “the coldest ever recorded.”

    The Associated Press had to retract a photo it released on July 27 with the caption, “The shallow meltwater lake is occurring due to an unusually warm period.”

    “In fact, the water accumulates in this way every summer,” AP admitted in a note to editors, adding that the photo was doubly misleading because “the camera used by the North Pole Environment Observatory has drifted hundreds of miles from its original position, which was a few dozen miles from the pole.”

    NOAA also reported that the “average lower strastospheric temperature, about six to ten miles above the Earth’s surface, for 2012 was record or near-record cold, depending on the dataset” even while the concentrations of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, continued to increase.

    "Even with all this data manipulation, the trend is down as shown by this Hadley global plot," writes Joseph D'Aleo, former director of meteorology at The Weather Channel. (See D'Aleo - Real Story About Temps.pdf)

    "Last year was the 8th warmest but 7th coldest since 1998. They explain it away with the predominance of La Ninas or a solar blip, but say it was the warmest decade nonetheless, so stop questioning us," he said.

    On August 7th, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten quoted Irish solar expert Ian Elliott predicting that lower levels of sunspot activity over the next few years “indicates that we may be on the path to a new little ice age.”

    “If you think scientists just couldn’t get any more incompetent, then think again. NOAA scientists even appear to believe that cold events are now signs of warming,” Gosselin points out.

    “When one carefully reads the report, we find that the NOAA findings actually do confirm precisely what the skeptics have been claiming all along:

    1. The Earth has stopped warming.

    2. The climate models exaggerated future warming [caused by] CO2 climate sensitivity is much lower than we first thought.

    “That’s the real issue at hand,” he added.

    - See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...irms-earth-cooling-trend#sthash.Tdtx4kN2.dpuf
     
  2. wildchild

    wildchild

    It is not that hard to figure this out.

    If there is global warming then these 'scientists' get a shit load of funding.

    If there is no global warming their funding shrivels like a guy's penis does after seeing a picture of Hillary Clinton.

    These 'scientists' need to keep the hoax alive to continue to receive funding. It is as simple as that.

    Look at Al Gore, spent most of his life as a second-rate politician. He leaves politics, and uses his connections to profit off the hoax. He is now LOADED and for what?
     

  3. The earth has not stopped warming at all. The atmosphere temperature is not the earth's heat content. The ice everywhere as a whole is melting away. The Artic, the Antarctic ice as a whole, the glaciers and Greenland ice sheet. The climate models are fine.
     

  4. So all the temperature records (remember there are hundreds if not thousands of them and their proxies) have been falsified? Wow. The ice just happens to melting?

    I want to know how you denier morons find your dick in the morning.
     
  5. jem

    jem

    so since the dawn of man made CO2 global warming speculation you nutters used air temperature records to build models and spew your baloney.

    Now that air temp records show he earth is has not warmed for 17 years despite and increase in man made CO2, you want to try some new argument out.



     
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    Leaving out oceans for the moment, there have been other pauses in the warming trend, all while CO2 was increasing.
     
  7. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    So CO2 doesn't matter then?
     
  8. How fucking stupid are you? The earth has NOT stopped warming. Will you EVER get it through your fucked-up head that the temperature of the AIR is NOT the same the temperature of the EARTH as whole.

    Try to get a clue you deceptive, lying piece of shit.
     
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Blood pressure: 150/110

    :D
     
  10. jem

    jem

    how stupid are you? I feel bad calling you are dipshit... because you may actually be one.


    lets review... your agw nutter argument was....

    that even though we all know the earths temperature cycles up and down... this time you know man made co2 is doing the warming because your models show that man made co2 causes air temps to rise.

    That was all the science you had...Now those models failed.

    So yes the earth could be warming or cooling... but the issue is you have no science saying man made co2 does it... because your models were tied to air temps.

    I really think you should shut up until you learn something about causation.





     
    #10     Aug 14, 2013