" "Globalists Are Marching Us Relentlessly Toward Nuclear Armageddon," Warns Former Senator BY TYLER DURDEN, SATURDAY, OCT 01, 2022 - 02:50 AM Fears of nuclear war are increasing across the West as Russia mobilizes hundreds of thousands of troops and declares annexation of parts of Ukraine. Meanwhile, President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that Ukraine is applying for membership in NATO. These two developments could be the most significant escalation since the war's start. Today's developments are a sobering reminder that nuclear war threats are mounting. Retired Virginia State Senator and retired Marine Col. Richard Black addressed members of the US Congress in an open letter on Tuesday about "globalists are marching us relentlessly toward this nuclear Armageddon." Black pointed out: There would have been no war had we not overthrown the democratically-elected government of Ukraine by violently ousting President Yanukovych in 2014. We promoted war by flooding Ukraine with massive arms shipments afterwards. The former senator said, "the US could have achieved peace by simply pressing Ukraine to implement the 2014 Minsk Peace Agreements which it had signed, establishing a clear framework for settling outstanding issues peacefully. Ukraine promised to implement the Minsk agreements, but chose instead to make war on the Donbass for the next seven years." He said NATO could've sought peace but chose war instead. NATO had ample opportunity for peace but deliberately chose war. The US realized that, with Russia's back to the wall, it would have no choice to but to attack. In 2007, US Ambassador to Russia William Burns pointedly warned that movement toward absorbing Ukraine into NATO might well trigger war between Ukraine and Russia. Nonetheless, the Obama administration overthrew the Ukrainian president and flooded in weapons, knowing that doing so would trigger war. Black said billionaire elites who have an interest in the region are making "war profits even if it means gambling the lives of hundreds of millions of people across the globe." "Should we annihilate the world's population to intervene in a border war where the US has no vital national interest?" the former senator asked. Black called for an immediate end to this war by making Ukraine a neutral, non-aligned state, "just as we did during the Cold War with Austria in 1955." But it appears the former senator's plea to avoid further conflict went unheard after Zelensky's declared intent to apply for expedited NATO membership as President Putin proclaimed the annexation of 15% of Ukraine. Based on Article 5, any acceptance of Ukraine into NATO would automatically trigger a Russia-West world war (WWIII). [...] "
tell me who's funding nutter lifestyle without telling me who's funding nutter lifestyle RICHMOND — Fresh off a sit-down with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Virginia state Sen. Richard H. Black turned up on an Arab TV channel last week making an extraordinary claim about one of the United States’ closest allies. Black said Britain’s MI6 intelligence service was planning a chemical weapons attack on the Syrian people, which it would then blame on Assad. “Around four weeks ago, we knew that British intelligence was working toward a chemical attack in order to blame the Syrian government, to hold Syria responsible,” Black said on Al Mayadeen, an Arab news channel based in Beirut. Black (R-Loudoun) said later that he meant the British were planning not to carry out an attack themselves, but to either direct rebels to do so or stage a phony attack, with actors posing as victims. Black’s comments about Britain promised to draw more controversy to the 74-year-old legislator, who was interviewed Friday by the Russian state-owned RT TV network. Five Democrats are competing to take him on next year in elections that will determine whether Republicans hold on to their two-seat majority in the Senate. In 2016, Black took a now-infamous trip to Syria, where he had a two-hour meeting with Assad. The Syrian government published photos of their handshake. In the midst of the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons and barrel bombs against civilian populations, Black announced that he didn’t believe the Assad regime “favors any sort of widespread improper conduct.” “There was sort of a spring in [Assad’s] step and a sense of joy and optimism, and looking out to the future and bringing the nation together,” Black later said. The visit also came after Black wrote a letter to Assad praising him for his leadership. According to Black, Assad was a “heroic” leader. (A fellow Republican joked at the time, “What’s the matter, Dick? Kim Jong Un not returning your text messages?”) Black would go on to say that the U.S. could not allow Assad to be toppled. But Black’s thirst for conspiracy didn’t end in Syria. Instead, it made him a favorite of another font of conspiracy: Russian propaganda outlet RT, which regularly featured Black to prop up Kremlin talking points. (RT mis-identified Black as a “Virginia Senator.”) Black also claimed that the Russian propaganda outlet was “the only credible mainstream media dealing with the Syrian conflict.”
Check out Richard Black’s history — he is a well-known nutcase pushing wild claims. Of course the source of this crap is Russian propaganda outlet Zero Hedge.
Even if you believe the fairy tales of America diabolism left wingers and Russian apologist tankies, how is nuclear Armageddon beneficial to globalists who rely on capitalism and a relatively stable well supplied system? Do these guys want to corner the post apocalyptic oil market? Is this guy blowing up pipelines hoping to trigger a nuclear showdown to short the world markets and corner the water market? or is Putin just fucking crazy? This all reminds me of this shit:
I don't believe they want Armageddon. But they do want new markets, and those are hard to find these days. Unless... they can expand NATO and then sell a shit ton of new expensive, high margin arms. US history is full of these kinds of military machinations.
and so is Soviet/Russia's. This is not your typical "American interventionism" no matter how they try to spin it as such. Not every military conflict we're involved with is our fault. There are "bad guys" outside our borders.
"In 2007, US Ambassador to Russia William Burns pointedly warned that movement toward absorbing Ukraine into NATO might well trigger war between Ukraine and Russia. Nonetheless, the Obama administration overthrew the Ukrainian president and flooded in weapons, knowing that doing so would trigger war." Michael Brenner: American Dissent on Ukraine Is Dying in Darkness Those do not appear to be fantastical sources. But on this issue we know only what we're spoon fed, wouldn't you agree?