Minor infractions in today's environment. Bad boys, bad boys. Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? Pay – that’s what. Four firms have been censured and fined a total of $4.75 million for violations of various provisions of Rule 15c3-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 otherwise known as the Market Access Rule 15c 3-5 and related exchange supervisory rules. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), along with Bats Global Markets, NASDAQ, the New York Stock Exchange have fined Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and Interactive Brokers LLC. None of the firms admitted or denied the charges but consented to the entry of FINRA’s and the Exchanges’ findings. FINRA and the exchange group said that between Between May and July 2017: Deutsche Bank was fined a total of $2.5 million. Citigroup was fined a total of $1 million. J.P. Morgan was fined a total of $800,000. Interactive Brokers was fined a total of $450,000. The Market Access Rule (15c 3-5) requires, among other things, that broker-dealers that access an exchange or an alternative trading system or provide their customers with access to these trading venues must adequately control the financial and regulatory risks of providing such access. The purpose of this requirement is to prevent firms from jeopardizing their own financial condition and that of other market participants, while also ensuring the stability and integrity of the financial system and the securities markets. In a joint statement from FINRA and the exchanges, these firms failed to comply with one or more provisions of the Market Access Rule, such as by failing to implement financial and regulatory risk management controls and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the entry of erroneous or duplicative orders; prevent the entry of orders that exceeded appropriate pre-set credit or capital thresholds; or supervise customer trading to detect and prevent potentially violative and manipulative activity. Additionally, the firms were found to have failed to comply with their obligations under the supervisory rules of FINRA and the Exchanges to establish and maintain a reasonably designed system, including written supervisory procedures, to supervise the activities of their customers. “It is important that firms have reasonable market access procedures in place to appropriately monitor for errors and risks that can be harmful to the integrity of our securities markets,” said FINRA and the Exchanges in the joint statement. When determining the appropriate sanction in the four matters, FINRA and the Exchanges considered the facts and circumstances particular to each matter, including, among other things, the number of erroneous orders that were entered on the Exchanges by the firms, potentially manipulative trading activity that went undetected by the firms, the market impact (both real and potential) of the underlying violative activity, the extent to which red flags were present, the firms’ disciplinary histories, the nature of the supervisory failures, the breadth and duration of the firms’ overall failures, remediation of the problematic conduct, and cooperation provided during the course of the investigations. The investigations that led to the actions set forth above were conducted by the Department of Market Regulation at FINRA and the Exchanges.
Can someone knowledgeable discuss hft with prime brokers. As far as I know I don't think they do credit check when orders are submitted so fast. Customer is likely to go bust before someone realizes anything is wrong.
Anyone knows what exactly did Interactive Brokers do wrong to get fined? I am a customer of IBKR and I am naturally concerned. So far, I'm happy with IBKR.
I'm guessing all of these have to do with price movement. Personally I think it is BS for exchanges and regulators to put the onus on brokers from executing client instructions. A market order in a thin stock for example - the person placing the order should know the consequences of placing the order. Basic fat finger and other checks are ok or if they would provide a clean set of rules all must follow.
IBKR has consistently warned me before and after I place an market order. Sometimes, for some reason which I don't know and don't like, IBKR slows down my trade execution. I hope IBKR does not inconvenience users to comply with regulations going forward.
IBKR will likely break their software in unexpected ways trying to fix this problem. Might just be easier/cheaper to pay the fines the next time around as well
I agree that the exchanges should at least share in some of the responsibilities in monitoring and regulating trading that goes in their exchanges in terms of preventing "violative and manipulative activities" from fat fingers. They run the exchanges for chrissake. I see it as exchanges trying to gouge more money.