http://www.newsweek.com/mike-flynns-secret-messages-show-trump-colluded-russia-experts-740246 Flynn's Secret Text Messages Show Trump Colluded With Russia, Experts Say By Cristina Maza On 12/6/17 at 3:34 PM Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, told a former business partner that economic sanctions against Russia would be “ripped up” as soon as Donald Trump took office, according to an anonymous whistleblower. The revelation is the latest evidence suggesting the Trump campaign may have agreed to help Russia in exchange for Russia’s help getting Trump elected president, experts say. Special counsel Robert Mueller had already secured Flynn's cooperation in his investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the outcome of the 2016 election, and Wednesday’s revelation publicly provides new evidence that will embolden Trump critics, experts say. “It won’t come as a surprise to the special counsel, but it reveals to the public that there was something in the nature of an exchange or quid pro quo,” Lisa Griffin, a law professor at Duke University, told Newsweek. “There are at least four potential avenues of criminality that the special counsel and others are exploring, and this provides more circumstantial evidence,” Griffin continued. “This might be relevant to the possibility of a bribery case, or assistance with the campaign that was done in exchange for what the Russians want most: the easing of sanctions.” Flynn pleaded guilty last week to lying to the FBI about his contacts with the Russian ambassador at the time, including speaking with him about U.S. sanctions against Russia. Flynn is known to have maintained close business ties with people in Russia and Turkey. According to the whistleblower, Flynn also wanted U.S. sanctions against Russia lifted in order to complete an international energy project he was working on. The whistleblower said Flynn texted his former business associate on the day of Trump’s inauguration to say that the project was “good to go.” The information was given to Representative Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, who published an open letter on Wednesday to the committee’s chairman, Trey Gowdy, explaining the revelations. “General Michael Flynn—within minutes of Donald Trump being sworn in as president—was communicating directly with his former business colleagues about their plans to work with Russia to build nuclear reactors in the Middle East,” the letter reads. "Our committee has credible allegations that President Trump's national security advisor sought to manipulate the course of international nuclear policy for the financial gain of his former business partners,” Cummings continued. “These grave allegations compel a full, credible and bipartisan congressional investigation.” The revelation is one of the strongest pieces of evidence to date that the Trump administration wanted to cancel U.S. sanctions against Russia, and it sheds light on why Flynn originally lied about his conversation with the Russian ambassador, a former Watergate prosecutor says. “This just confirms the materiality of Flynn’s lies about what happened during the elections. This confirms that there is a quid pro quo for Russian help with winning the elections,” Nick Akerman told Newsweek. He was an assistant special prosecutor during the Watergate investigation. The whistleblower first approached Cummings after Newsweek published an account of Flynn's role in pursuing a joint U.S.-Russian plan to build nuclear power plants in the Middle East, according to the letter. Cummings reportedly chose not to go public with the information because Mueller asked him to delay acting on it until the special counsel completed his investigation. Cummings decided to go public with the information after Flynn agreed to cooperate with Mueller. President Barack Obama first imposed economic sanctions on Russia in 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and began supporting separatists in eastern Ukraine. New sanctions were levied in December 2016 to punish Russia for its attempts to disrupt the U.S. election. In June 2016, the Trump campaign was directly lobbied by a Kremlin-linked Russian lawyer, who met with Donald Trump Jr. and Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, among others, to discuss lifting human rights sanctions.
“General Michael Flynn—within minutes of Donald Trump being sworn in as president—was communicating directly with his former business colleagues about their plans to work with Russia to build nuclear reactors in the Middle East,” the letter reads. LOL
The "experts" have been saying that for a year now. No charges have been brought. More leftist delusion reporting the news they hope for rather than dealing with reality. Collusion is a dead horse. Move on to the obstruction fantasy. At least that isn't so stale.
The experts also said this case would take awhile.A case of this magnitude is going to take longer than 6 months.Was Ken Starr finished in 6 months?
Pretty much. He was assigned to investigate the whitewater crimes and he could not find any traction there. But was he done using his witchhunting license to go off and find something else? No. Same trajectory with Mueller.
clearly there is some confusion here. Israel is not moving its capital. It has been Jerusalem. Trump has ordered that the embassy be moved from Tel aviv to Jerusalem. This is a major diplomatic faux pas that amounts to a slap in the face to the Palestinians. It is counter to our long-time efforts to negotiate a peaceful settlement between Israel and the Palestinians, discredits the U.S. in the eyes of the Arab world and in the eyes of our allies. It does not serve the best long term interests of the United States! It does, however, fan the fires of discord in the region, and make the Russians very happy, as it serves to drive a wedge between the U.S. and its traditional allies. This latest Trump move is an example of how NOT to conduct foreign policy. I can't imagine that Tillerson approved this move! There will surely be war now between the White House and The State Department. Do you think that is a good idea? I would hardly think so.
You mean it runs counter to the long standing policy of presidents not meeting their campaign promises? We feel your pain.
or this could be worked out behind the scenes as part of a new anti iran deal with US allies in the region like the new king in Saudi Arabia.