But I thought the new EPA was following science for a change instead of politicisation of it? If the science is fake, why avoid discussing and exposing it? Or maybe they were relying on fake peer reviewed papers for their 'science'. Who would have thought that an oil lobbyist who lies blatantly on TV serving another pathological liar lied again? This week, without explanation, the Environmental Protection Agency canceled the speaking appearances of three EPA scientists who were scheduled to talk at a conference about climate change. In another development, the agency is backing away from a congressionally mandated review of asbestos and other toxins. These are the latest developments in EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's drive to shift his agency's focus, which critics say amounts to gutting the mission of environmental protection.
Excellent. Sending staff to discuss "climate change" is no different than sending them to a conference to discuss Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.
go ahead post peer reviewed science showing man made co2 is causing global warming. you know there isn't any. at least there probably was a St. Nicholas.
History of scientific research In the late 19th century scientists experimentally discovered that N2 and O2 do not absorb infrared radiation (called, at that time, "dark radiation"), while water (both as true vapor and condensed in the form of microscopic droplets suspended in clouds) and CO2 and other poly-atomic gaseous molecules do absorb infrared radiation. In the early 20th century researchers realized that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere made Earth's overall temperature higher than it would be without them.
Yes, he is as serious as the lawyers for OJ Simpson were. Being a lawyer, as jerm is, is a profession that rewards intellectual dishonesty. Lying becomes second nature to them. The amazing thing is that he considers himself a "Christian". The death and destruction resulting from liars about the science of climate change like him will be huge. He and those like him are truly detestable disgusting immoral people.
you will be seen by everyone who reads this to be full of shit... unless you can post peer reviewed science stating man made co2 is causing warming... that is not a now failed model. Guess what... if you had any... the author would have a Nobel prize. == hey troll who sells a greenhouse gas 2000 times more powerful than co2 for a living. CO2 greens the planet... if co2 goes up it will green the planet and the exploding population will be easier to feed. Your air conditioner gas that you sell for a living has no such benefit. So by your own standards you are an eco terrorist and I volunteered to my services as an attorney to file law suits keep ocean and bays clean. It ticks me off you keep making me call you an eco terrorist. you should just shut up .
no one is disputing that co2... has warming properties. NASA also tells us it has cooling properties. The issue is does man made co2 cause warming. I have shown you peer reviewed science that co2 levels trails change in ocean and air temps. The correlation is about 90 percent. So you tell us... has does the lagging variable cause changes in the lead variable...
Because it's a multivariate world, you never heard of Milankovitch cycles? Try these peer reviewed papers for a start https://agwobserver.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/papers-on-the-milankovitch-cycles-and-climate/