Actually, Covid misinformation/disinformation about the Germany, Italy, France, Spain, Russia and Sweden population is well-liked here at ET. Thus, its acceptable posting behavior about those populations. I heard that Russia released a new Variant of Concern on the people of Ukraine. wrbtrader
Merely waiting for respected mainstream sources in English to step in rather than a website named eugyppius: a plague chronicle It is pretty clear from the German publications that this is nothing more than a filing by the German insurance industry in an attempt to avoid financial liability. Note the figures they give are estimated -- they took a small sample of time and correlated it into the future & magically the German insurance industry arrived at high figures on vaccine adverse reactions -- putting forward they should not be responsible for any financial consequences of vaccine damage payouts whatsoever.
So I politely provide an article on Covid figures in Florida from a site that is readily accessible and references where they go the text of the article from -- rather than providing the original which is behind a local paper firewall & not accessible. Tell us what exactly is wrong with the data in that article -- if you don't like the url source than you were free to pay for a subscription to read it in it's original location.
I just find it funny that you attack the source when you don't like the message, but then you use random sources that aren't mainstream when you like the message. Then you use mediabiasfactcheck to piss on sources other people post when they are labeled as "mixed" for factual reporting, then you turn around and regularly use rawstory.com which is - yep, you guessed it, labeled as mixed for factual reporting at the very same site. You're a clown. You'd be better off just not saying anything, but as I said - you can't help yourself. Clown's gotta clown.