Eight Megacap Stocks Make for a Funny Sort of Bull Market

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by ETJ, Jun 7, 2023.

  1. ETJ

    ETJ

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/eight-...sort-of-bull-market-bdf9d2a5?mod=hp_lead_pos5


    Eight Megacap Stocks Make for a Funny Sort of Bull Market
    Renaissance of megacapitalization stocks accounts for shift from bear to tentative new bull market—but comes with significant shifts in market behavior

    [​IMG]By James Mackintosh
    June 7, 2023 7:12 am ET
    47
    [​IMG]
    Investors are facing a new market narrative. PHOTO: SPENCER PLATT/GETTY IMAGES
    Investors need a new acronym. The FANGs and various remixes worked for a while, but 2023 has expanded the market leadership to seven, or perhaps eight, stocks that now dominate the market and seem to move to a different tune to the rest.

    There’s no word—in English at least—that neatly links Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta (nee Facebook), Alphabet (Google), Tesla and the optional Netflix, and my creative efforts have come to naught. Wall Street’s attempts haven’t really caught on, although Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research’s “MegaCap-8” is simple and to the point.


    But the renaissance of megacapitalization companies matters. These stocks account for the shift from a bear to a tentative new bull market. And their resurgence comes alongside significant shifts in market behavior, especially when it comes to interest rates. In particular, the megacap stocks no longer seem to care what the Federal Reserve does.

    The question is whether the new market narrative can last. If it can, buy the <acronym to come> stocks. The alternative is that these companies got lucky by being at the intersection of several supportive stories, at least some of which may have run their course. I lean toward the second view, with these being the themes:



    • Quality. Most, though not all, of this year’s big winners are hugely cash-generative firms with strong balance sheets, the definition of “quality” companies in Wall Street parlance. While the widely forecast recession hasn’t yet arrived, the combination of recession danger and the bank runs that started in March make quality stocks attractive.
    • Growth. Even if there’s no recession, slower economic growth is inevitable. That makes stocks that grow whatever the broader economic trends—as investors assume the big stocks do—more attractive.
    • Artificial intelligence. Nvidia is already a winner from the latest iteration of AI, and the others are all thought to be winners, either because they invest a lot in it or because their cloud services are used by it. I think too much is already priced in, but it’s clearly helped this year.
    • Interest rates may not have peaked, but they are almost certainly now close to the peak. Stocks that were last year crushed by rising rates and bond yields become less sensitive when the threat of big further Fed rises is removed.
    Big Tech Leaves Rest in the DustPerformance this yearSource: FactSetNote: Nasdaq's seven largest firms by value, plus Netflix, make up Yardeni's MegaCap-8
    Jan. 2023Feb.MarchAprilMayJune-250255075100125150175%NvidiaMeta PlatformsTeslaAmazon.comAlphabet AMicrosoftAppleNetflixNYSE Composite
    Taken together, these tailwinds have pushed the biggest stocks as measured by the Russell Top 50 Mega Cap index to beat the Russell 2000 index of smaller companies by more than 20 percentage points this year, better than any five-month period from the creation of the measure in 2002 up to the pandemic.

    They’ve also left the rest of the market in the dust, as other stocks go sideways. And since March, when bank runs began, the link between higher interest rates and lower prices for growth stocks such as the MegaCap-8 that held for most of last year has evaporated, with yields becoming irrelevant. A plausible explanation is that with the Fed probably close to peak rates any further rises will be relatively small.

    SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
    What is your outlook for the stock market over the next few quarters? Join the conversation below.

    What can go wrong for buyers of what are undoubtedly some of the world’s greatest companies? The usual mistake is to overpay; companies that everyone agrees are great are more likely to be overpriced than ones everyone agrees are rubbish. This is my objection to Nvidia, the most obvious winner from AI. It probably will be a big winner, but everyone already knows this.

    The second mistake is that the companies might not be what you think. Meta has done well this year but its forecast sales per share are still lower than at the start of last year, not the usual hallmark of a growth company. Expectations for Tesla’s earnings and sales have both fallen sharply this year, although that hasn’t stopped its shares soaring to 54 times forecast earnings.

    2023 Goes for GrowthRussell 1000 indexesSource: FactSet
    Jan. 2023Feb.MarchAprilMayJune-50510152025%GrowthValue
    Alphabet and Meta both rely on online advertising, which has matured and so may be vulnerable to economic weakness. Amazon’s online retailing is likewise susceptible. And the stickiness of Netflix’s streaming subscribers is still untested in a normal recession, which won’t bring the stuck-at-home subscriptions the company enjoyed in the lockdown. Are these companies really resistant to recession?

    The third danger is that known risks aren’t properly priced. In the case of Big Tech, the risk is of a new regulatory and antitrust onslaught, as they’ve lost their popularity with the public and politicians. This is unpredictable and hard to price, but potentially very significant—as with the antitrust regulators in the U.S. and U.K. trying to stop Microsoft from buying videogame maker Activision Blizzard.

    It’s great to have supportive stories, and the narratives do justify at least some of the price rises. But they’ve already gone a very long way, at a time when the rest of the market is stagnant. (If you come up with a decent acronym, please email or tweet me!)

    Big Beat SmallMegacap stocks beat smaller companies so far this year by the most since at least 2002Five-month change in Russell Top 50 minus Russell 2000Source: RefinitivNote: Monthly data
    2003'05'10'15'20-40-30-20-1001020pct. pts
    Write to James Mackintosh at james.mackintosh@wsj.com
     
  2. zdreg

    zdreg

    Chiefs are leading but the Indians are not following. It is nothing unusual. Other times it is the reverse. The situation gives financial journalists something to write about.
     
  3. %%
    WO'N , William o Neil had a great winning quote;
    markets are seldom wrong, opinions frequently are. Amen
    I see many 50 200day movin' averages up = uptrending
    I dont know what the WSJ 65 dma are doing , maybe to little to late/ like a 65 dma maybe LOL Funny:D:D
     
  4. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    ! Beaaaaaaaar.png
     
    ETJ likes this.
  5. Specterx

    Specterx

    It's all about liquidity and money flows. Liquidity improved for the first six months of the year due to a combination of IOER helicopter money, pre-debt-ceiling depletion of the TGA, and (after March) the Fed's buying bank assets for 130 cents on the dollar. With AI hype as the trigger it was enough to levitate a handful of longstanding market war-horses, but not enough to fuel the general market - e.g. RSP is still well below the 2023 highs.

    Breadth doesn't by itself say anything about the future. The move may broaden out or it may not, and even reverse.
     
  6. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    Sure there is.
    In my creative indifference to such things, I coined it and published it right here about a year ago.

    "A Fat Man"

    And that is the perfect description.

    A - Alphabet

    F - Facebook
    A - Apple
    T - Tesla

    M - Microsoft
    A - Amazon
    N - Nividea