Dreamer ruling

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TreeFrogTrader, Jun 18, 2020.

  1. As discussed, the court will require Trump and the government to follow the requirements of the administrative procedures act in unwinding any programs but will not counter the assertion that it can be reversed if those procedures are followed.

    This is basically was what ruled in the DAPA case so nothing new. It is a double edged sword for the pro-immigration types because the lefties will promote it as a victory but the victory they need is to see the court rule that the executive order cannot be reversed. Instead, the court keeps saying that when the government does something to eliminate an established program, it must hold all the required hearings, public notifications, hear from witnesses etc. rather than just deciding it wants to do something.

    Very dicey for dreamers if Trump wins. The court put bondo and duct tape on it but also outlined- as it did in the DAPA case- a legal roadmap of how the executive order can be reversed.
     
  2. I think people are more concerned with current illegals and those who have committed crimes in the system than children brought here when little and contributing to the only country they really know as home.

    I think both parties would be better served addressing current immigration issues than wasting so much time on children who are actually paying taxes and working or going to school and were brought here so many years ago.