So the current Governor (democrat) is in hot water for his past racist behavior Now the Lt. Governor who may be elevated is accused of sexual assault from the past. He says its a smear but admits he has a liaison with her at the Democrat National Convention when he worked for John Edwards (of all democrats.) https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/04/us/politics/justin-fairfax-sexual-assault.html
Wait, I thought all women accusers were to be believed? That’s what the Kavanaugh hearings told us. GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT, right Libs?
Pretty much true.........except....I dunno. Depends on whether the woman comes forward and what kind of circus that creates or not. The reason that I say I dunno is because of the dem campaign clown show going on where they will throw one of their own children under the bus to distinguish themselves from the others and be the sparticus who does the virtue signaling the bestest and the mostest. They will lay low and talk generically about letting everyone be heard etc but if one of the candidates even suggests that the others are not believing the woman while saying that candidate says that all women must be believed, then whammo, they all gonna sacrifice one of their own chillin right there and take him down. After all, it's about them and the campaign. Just recall that time when Senator Bitch Hirono from Hawaii went to the mic and said that "men should just shut up and stand up." Whammo, just like dominoes every pussy man -starting right there with Blumenthal, next Schumer, next...next... could not wait to go public and declare that they absolutely BELIEVED the woman. It was ugly but I am just saying, that if someone tweaks one of those dem or men women candidates for not being a believer, they will turn viciously. I know that it can be argued that it was easier for them when Kavanaugh was the victim but I will say right back atcha that all those dem clown candidates are fucking whores-the men included- and NOTHING is more important than keeping their "edge" up for their campaigns. And that Julie Swetneck routine was winner for them so more could be good too. The Lt. Guv is probably okay if the woman does not come forward- publicly. The dems can say that that is one thing that is different from the kavanaugh case versus this VA situation- SO FAR. Except it looks like she did come forward in the background and it was not believed. Keep in mind that Swetnick did not really come forward publicly either. She just got outed by Feinstein. There is funny stuff going on with the Washington Post too. The ran with the Kavanaugh thing but not with the VA thing when they had inside information. They say it is a difference in evidence. Yeh, okay. We will see. Bottomline: The dems will try for the ideal scenario which is to see whitey go down and someone with their preferred skin color rolled in so they will work to protect Fairfax for a bit just by keeping their burner turned down. But just one whiff of someone accusing them of not believing women and they will sacrifice him like a goat right there. They are running campaigns. What a mess there in Virginia. I dont even dare to ask who the hell is third in line - the AG I guess- and what his/her status is and will be accused of.
As expected the Lt Governors story changed over a 24 hour period. It went from I never met that woman to I met her at the Democratic Convention while working on the John Edwards campaign and the sex was consensual,
Cmon man. He evolved. Evolving is good. There is a lot of that sudden-evolving there in VA. Must be something in the water. The guv apologized mega-profusely one day for what he did in that picture. Then the next day, NOPE, I KNOW NOTHING- IT WAS NOT ME.
Are ya happy now lefties? It is, after all, you dopes that have created this chaos with your silly purity tests and assumption of guilt without evidence. All this in your never ending effort to draw a distinction between yourselves and Trump. Well, mission NOT accomplished. There is no doubt your behavior is exactly the same, it's who you do and don't hold accountable that is the glaring difference.