College faculty ideology over time

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ipatent, Jun 15, 2025 at 11:28 PM.

  1. ipatent

    ipatent

  2. spy

    spy

    [​IMG]

    Coincidence? Everyone likes sexy and easy... free money can solve all our problems! Limited resources? That's nonsense! Print more money and give it away for the asking. What a load of poppycock.
     
  3. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    your lesser of two evils is adding 400bn to the deficit while making access to trade schools harder.
     
  4. spy

    spy

    Well, can you imagine what the greater of two evils would have done? You'll have to because the Dems didn't win.

    So just keep making stuff up out of whole cloth if it makes you feel better.
     
  5. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    She would have had a proper military parade that cost 100MM and she would have fired a lot more government workers. She also would have added 200% tariffs across the board. And she would have used her clout to start a 10 billion dollar private equity fund instead of the paltry 1789 one.


    It would have been awesome.
     
  6. spy

    spy

    Lol, that's a great daydream... she should have said as much during the campaign though. Maybe someone would have voted for her then.

    Instead, she came out with new age gibberish that didn't make sense to anyone and when asked "what would you differently"... she literally answered nothing.

    You can't build something up by simply tearing something unrelated down nwm. The Democrats don't seem to understand this. They need to be constructive in ways that resonate w/ the electorate.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2025 at 10:20 AM
  7. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    You are right. In seriousness, Kamala realized that problems were difficult and she wasn't going to say otherwise.

    But Everyone likes sexy and easy... free money can solve all our problems! Limited resources? That's nonsense! Print more money and give it away for the asking.

    And that's why Trump won.
     
  8. spy

    spy

    Uhh... I'm sure this somehow makes sense to you. IDK if it's meant to be facetious or what, but nonetheless, the point isn't getting across to me.

    Blame it on my ADD
    ~AWOLNATION​

    If you want to clarify, I'm happy to listen. If you just want to yell, or exclaim at clouds, that's your prerogative too.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2025 at 11:36 AM
  9. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    Reread your original post i quoted. Without realizing it, you explained why Trump won. But you didn't mean to. You tried to explain something about colleges which didn't really make sense.

    How dumb are you?
     
  10. spy

    spy

    So, you're saying that since I made the statement that "everyone loves free money" and that's what Kamala promised she should have won?

    I understand how that would seem contradictory to you but I was being sarcastic... I don't think "everyone loves free money". I think most people like to work for their money (or at least think they are, which is what matters more).

    Unfortunately, the Democrats (Socialists?) offer "free money" and don't even bother to disguise it any more.

    Pro tip: If you got rid of the blatant insults and appealed to people's "better angels" you might come off as more objective and convincing. Instead you just seem like a sore loser to me.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2025 at 11:47 AM