Mueller is investigating russian interference in the 2016 election. According to the left, Trump was colluding with Russians during the whole campaign. Now Mueller comes in and says the smoking gun evidence that Trump and the Russian rigged the election is the fact that Trump told Flynn to contact the Russians 1 month AFTER the election. If Trump was colluding with the Russians, why would he need Flynn to contact them in December 2016? This timeline doesn't add up.
I'm sure the details will surface soon enough. 6 months ago, Flynn had nothing to do with Russia according to the right wingers.
So that’s called quid pro quo. That is Latin for this for that. If you help me get elected I will help you with favorable policies after the election, allegedly (lol).
Point to the post 6 months ago, by the rightwingers that claim Flynn never talked to Russians? Feb 13, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/...-national-security-adviser-michael-flynn.html Michael T. Flynn, the national security adviser, resigned on Monday night after it was revealed that he had misled Vice President Mike Pence and other top White House officials about his conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States.
So it's 8 months, I also only bothered to look for 30 seconds. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/posts/4460437/
How do you perform a quid pro quo if you don't have contact? This contact that supposedly Trump directed Flynn to make occurred AFTER the election. If Trump pulled a quid pro quo, wouldn't he already have contacts? This argument makes no sense. Also, what we know is the Russia interference was comprised of a bunch of Facebook ads, alot of which were anti-Trump. If Trump wanted to do Facebook ads, he could had done it himself. He sure as hell didn't need the Russians to help him.
It doesn't work but that won't stop them from doing what they do best. Making shit up and yammering on about all the what if's and might be and could have been and on and on while providing no actual evidence.