There is no evidence against Trump but we do know the following. TRUMP HAS NEVER BEEN UNDER INVESTIGATION. The media and the democrats lied to the American people. Comey is a leaker. The New York Times published fabricated stories. Senior Intelligence officials stated the Trump NEVER pressured them. McCain has dementia. Trump encouraged Comey to investigate the Russian hack claim and welcomed him to out any associates who were involved in wrong doing. Comey went to dinner with Trump. A high school senior went to a track meet and her prom, IN THE SAME DAY. Its a huge story that has broken today.
An interview with one of my favorite writers. I would encourage you to listen to the entire thing. He does a very good job at dissecting the media bias we see and hear on all sides. Specific to this Trump/Russia conspiracy go to 1hr. 3 minutes, 30 seconds to listen. I'll just say if Matt can't buy this conspiracy theory, there's nothing there. https://www.c-span.org/video/?428727-1/depth-matt-taibbi Much damning evidence of media bias at 1hr. 8 minutes
Lets examine why there is no evidence coming forth. It's easy to make up a story, not so easy to fabricate evidence, and it's criminal to do so. The left showed their hand last year when it become apparent that Trump was a force to be reckoned with. There would be no cake walk for Clinton. Such lofty news outlets as the NYT, via people like Jim Rootenberg came right out and said that they felt Trump was so extreme, so much of a threat, that they must re-think their objective posture. That is one very tine step from just advocating doing whatever it takes to win, even if it means fabricating stories. So they dipped their toe into the we'll just make stuff up well hoping that would be enough to secure a victory for Clinton. Not to be, Trump won. How could this be? A guy like Trump just cannot win, and yet to all objective people the man won fair and square. Can't be says the leftist, and so a conspiracy is born. We cannot forget that these people that expect us to believe them are the very same people who said that Trump was such a threat that objectivity should be thrown out the window, and he must be brought down no matter what is required to do so. Then they wonder why truly unbiased people look at them with great skepticism. What they did last year was to basically say that the democratic electorate is comprised of two types of people. People so ignorant that they will believe anything they read, or people who have a bias that runs so deep they don't care about anything but winning, facts and truth be damned. Problem is that their candidate lost and now all they have are the lies. Sure, this group will still believe the lies, the story telling of some grand conspiracy written by professional who tell stories for a living, but evidence, actual evidence is a whole different game. You know,evidence like a former FBI Director telling everyone that he was "advised" to not use the word investigation to describe an investigation. Lets tone it down Jimbo, use something like we're looking into the matter. Evidence like a former president who happens to be the husband of the candidate now running for office just dropping by to visit with the AG. Maybe evidence like thousands of improperly handled classified emails, many of which just "accidently" were erased, all of which are federal crimes which at a minimum should be prosecuted, but no, couldn't find any intent so no prosecution, intent being irrelevant, but no matter, she skates. Evidence like a DNC and media colluding during the primaries to give an edge to one candidate during debates. Plenty of evidence to be had once they start looking in the right place. Yeah, it was right there in front of everyone all along. Wasn't so hard to see after all, now was it?
Trump should turn the tables on them. Indict Hillary, the people around her, Comey, Rice, all the leakers. Go after them full bore. Then, if the democrats try to impeach Trump, he can say they are just trying to protect corrupt pols.
trumps defense has sucked so far so he should go on offense. the best defense is sometimes a good offense. We know trump can be offensive. pun intended.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ury-indicts-accused-nsa-leaker-reality-winner oh, I forgot you guys already moved the goal post