Andrew McCabe doing the moonwalk

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TreeFrogTrader, Feb 14, 2019.

  1. Someone needs to lock this clown up.

    He opened the investigation so far in advance of when he says here and the evidence is overwhelming that he was working on it through all the dossier/FISA crap and strzok/page/baker types of communications long, long before Trump was elected.

    Even if one were to accept what he said here it would only mean that the minute Trump was elected he went right to work trying to bring him down. No one doubts that.

    We need to get Sessions out of there. Wait.......

    McCabe needs to be prosecuted and his law license revoked after he is convicted. Let's get on with it.

    https://nypost.com/2019/02/14/mccabe-says-he-launched-probe-into-trump-after-comey-firing/
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2019
  2. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Well, someone is lying.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...-secretly-recording-trump-say-sources-n911981

    WASHINGTON — Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was joking when he discussed wearing a wire to secretly record President Donald Trump and does not believe Trump should be removed from office through the use of procedures outlined in the Constitution's 25th Amendment, according to Justice Department officials who requested anonymity to discuss the conversation.
     
  3. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

  4. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    The book is probably for a legal defense fund.
     
  5. That plus the fact that he does not have a job and trying to get a job as a lawyer when you are under criminal investigation by the FBI creates "issues."

    As you may recall, McCabe held on to his overall retirement but lost the "Early Bird" special portion of it because he was canned before reaching the magic number of years. So he is without job and retirement. I guess when he reaches age 60 or something he will get his normal retirement. can remember the exact years, but that is the general idea.

    In regard to someone lying, ie. Rosenstein versus McCabe. Yup. None of the rats are on the same page now. McCabe defends himself against past and ongoing action by the IG/FBI by saying that he had permission to leak/talk to the press and that he got that permission from Comey, but Comey testified before Congress that - no way did he give permission to ANYONE.

    Add to that all the other side players such as Strzok and Page who clearly have texts about how they kept Andy informed about various activities that McCabe says he knew nothing about.

    What a mess. Not sure Bill Barr will look the other way. Not sure he will do anything either. BUT I AM DAMN SURE THAT HE WILL DO MORE THAN THE ELF WOULD HAVE.

    Going back to the defense fund thing. Actually Andy has already burned through a gofundme fund and keeps that active, I believe, except his troubles keep mounting up. The lefties will tell you that it has all blown over. It has not.
     
    Snarkhund, Tom B and WeToddDid2 like this.
  6. UsualName

    UsualName

    Big bad Comey messed the fbi up when tried to stand up to Clinton because he thought it was safe to take a shot at her. Then the Russian conspirators won the presidency and they are using his power move on Clinton against him and the rest of the fbi.

    Now today, we’re still trying to understand what happened and trolls that read RT and other Russian bots are trying to tell us not to listen to the former deputy director of the fbi about a counter intelligence operation launched to figure out what the fuck was going on between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

    Not gonna fly, partner. Manafort is now exposed hiding meeting with Russians he was sharing campaign information with - and get this - IN JARED KUSHNERS BUILDING.

    Yeah, no. Keep going McCabe. This whole situation needs to be cleaned up.
     
  7. Tom B

    Tom B

    Collusion: The Criminalization of Policy Disputes
    By Andrew C. McCarthy
    February 16, 2019


    The word covers every contact between anyone connected to Trump and anyone connected to Russia, with no need to show that a crime was committed.

    What a weasel word “collusion” is.

    In Washington, Senator Richard Burr (R., N.C.), chairman of the Intelligence Committee, has now seen fit to pronounce that, after two years of investigation, the panel has found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian regime. Meanwhile, in a nearby courtroom, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s senior staffer, Andrew Weissmann, told a federal judge that an August 2016 meeting between the then-chairman of the Trump campaign and a suspected Russian intelligence officer “goes . . . very much to the heart of what the special counsel is investigating” — which sure sounds like Mueller’s collusion hunt is alive and well.

    What gives?

    Readers of these columns know that the “collusion” label has been a pet peeve of your humble correspondent since the media-Democratic “Putin hacked the election” narrative followed hard on the declaration of Donald Trump’s victory in the wee hours of Wednesday morning, November 9, 2016.

    The reason for the collusion label is obvious. Those peddling the “Putin hacked the election” story have always lacked credible evidence that Trump was complicit in the Kremlin’s “cyber-espionage.” They could not show a criminal conspiracy. Connections between denizens of Trump World and Putin’s circle might be very intriguing, and perhaps even politically scandalous. But only a conspiracy — an agreement by two or more people to commit an actual criminal offense, such as hacking — would be a reasonable basis for prosecution or impeachment.

    This dearth of proof was significant. The Russians apparently started hacking operations in 2014, long before Trump entered the race. The FBI first warned the Democratic National Committee about penetration of its servers in September 2015. By the time Trump won, the Bureau and U.S. intelligence agencies had been working hard to understand the nature and extent of Kremlin-directed hacking operations for two years. The investigation was so high-level, so intense, that shortly before the election, there were confrontational conversations between CIA director John Brennan and his Russian counterpart, FSB chief Alexander Bortnikov, and later between President Obama and Russian president Putin.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019...nvestigation-criminalization-policy-disputes/
     
    Snarkhund and WeToddDid2 like this.
  8. Snarkhund

    Snarkhund

    McCabe is NOT listening to his lawyers lol.

    When you have Alan Dershowitz saying on national media that you are a coup plotter you might want to tone down the rhetoric a few notches, maybe take a vacay to Cuba or something.

    McCabe is literally under criminal investigation (that whole pesky fraudulent FISA warrant thing) and his bomb throwing and back pedaling sure make him look culpable.
     
    WeToddDid2 likes this.