https://theconversation.com/50-year...biology-of-how-muscles-change-with-age-172941 There is perhaps no better way to see the absolute pinnacle of human athletic abilities than by watching the Olympics. But at the Winter Games this year – and at almost all professional sporting events – you rarely see a competitor over 40 years old and almost never see a single athlete over 50. This is because with every additional year spent on Earth, bodies age and muscles don’t respond to exercise the same as they used to. I lead a team of scientists who study the health benefits of exercise, strength training and diet in older people. We investigate how older people respond to exercise and try to understand the underlying biological mechanisms that cause muscles to increase in size and strength after resistance or strength training. Old and young people build muscle in the same way. But as you age, many of the biological processes that turn exercise into muscle become less effective. This makes it harder for older people to build strength but also makes it that much more important for everyone to continue exercising as they age. How the body builds muscle The exercise I study is the type that makes you stronger. Strength training includes exercises like pushups and situps, but also weightlifting and resistance training using bands or workout machines. When you do strength training, over time, exercises that at first felt difficult become easier as your muscles increase in strength and size – a process called hypertrophy. Bigger muscles simply have larger muscle fibers and cells, and this allows you to lift heavier weights. As you keep working out, you can continue to increase the difficulty or weight of the exercises as your muscles get bigger and stronger. It is easy to see that working out makes muscles bigger, but what is actually happening to the cells as muscles increase in strength and size in response to resistance training? Any time you move your body, you are doing so by shortening and pulling with your muscles – a process called contraction. This is how muscles spend energy to generate force and produce movement. Every time you contract a muscle – especially when you have to work hard to do the contraction, like when lifting weights – the action causes changes to the levels of various chemicals in your muscles. In addition to the chemical changes, there are also specialized receptors on the surface of muscle cells that detect when you move a muscle, generate force or otherwise alter the biochemical machinery within a muscle. In a healthy young person, when these chemical and mechanical sensory systems detect muscle movement, they turn on a number of specialized chemical pathways within the muscle. These pathways in turn trigger the production of more proteins that get incorporated into the muscle fibers and cause the muscle to increase in size. These cellular pathways also turn on genes that code for specific proteins in cells that make up the muscles contracting machinery. This activation of gene expression is a longer-term process, with genes being turned on or off for several hours after a single session of resistance exercise. The overall effect of these many exercise-induced changes is to cause your muscles to get bigger. How older muscles change While the basic biology of all people, young or old, is more or less the same, something is behind the lack of senior citizens in professional sports. So what changes in a person’s muscles as they age? What my colleagues and I have found in our research is that in young muscle, a little bit of exercise produces a strong signal for the many processes that trigger muscle growth. In older people’s muscles, by comparison, the signal telling muscles to grow is much weaker for a given amount of exercise. These changes begin to occur when a person reaches around 50 years old and become more pronounced as time goes on. In a recent study, we wanted to see if the changes in signaling were accompanied by any changes in which genes – and how many of them – respond to exercise. Using a technique that allowed us to measure changes in thousands of genes in response to resistance exercise, we found that when younger men exercise, there are changes in the expression of more than 150 genes. When we looked at older men, we found changes in the expression of only 42 genes. This difference in gene expression seems to explain, at least partly, the more visible variation between how young and old people respond to strength training. Staying fit as you age When you put together all of the various molecular differences in how older adults respond to strength training, the result is that older people do not gain muscle mass as well as young people. But this reality should not discourage older people from exercising. If anything, it should encourage you to exercise more as you age. Exercise still remains one of the most important activities older adults can do for their health. The work my colleagues and I have done clearly shows that although the responses to training lessen with age, they are by no means reduced to zero. We showed that older adults with mobility problems who participate in a regular program of aerobic and resistance exercise can reduce their risk of becoming disabled by about 20%. We also found a similar 20% reduction in risk of becoming disabled among people who are already physically frail if they did the same workout program. While younger people may get stronger and build bigger muscles much faster than their older counterparts, older people still get incredibly valuable health benefits from exercise, including improved strength, physical function and reduced disability. So the next time you are sweating during a workout session, remember that you are building muscle strength that is vital to maintaining mobility and good health throughout a long life.
I would like to point out something, that almost never considered. Muscle is weight, even if it is useful weight. At 20-30 it doesn't matter, but when you pass the half century mark, unless you have some special plan (like competing or whatever), why would you want to carry an extra 5-10 lbs when you don't really use it for your work? So as I age, I care more about stamina than being more muscular. I am talking here about excessive, unused muscles...
This is where I have a problem. If the exercise is meaningful, then it will take longer for the older person to recover than it would a younger person. So how, then, would that work? Suboptimal training? Junk volume? I think this guy should get together with these guys and figure something out: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/no-time-to-exercise-what-about-three-seconds-a-day.364813/
You really should read this book: Muscle is an organ of sorts that keeps the entire machine running smoothly. As you age, unless you're working those muscles meaningfully, you will lose them, notable the fast twitch variety. This is where people run into trouble later in life, either with mobility issues, metabolic syndrome, or whatever. Get the book, Pekelo. I promise you will not regret it. You may not agree entirely with the suggested exercise protocol, but the way that the science is explained makes wanting to keep and build muscle (naturally) a no brainer. Besides, everyone looks better as they approach their natural genetic potential. Don't be swayed by purported "naturals" on the Internet, the majority of whom are probably not: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...d-bodybuilders-say-most-use-in-secret.364753/
Most people around 50 years old that I know already have a decent amount of muscle, so not being able to easily put more on isn't really a deal-breaker. It's the fat side of the equation that's the real problem. By the age of 50, it seems that most people have very entrenched eating patterns that their bodies are a direct reflection of . I think if there was some sort of 3D scanner that could show people a picture of what they currently look like naked in the mirror versus what they could actually look like if they put on no additional muscle but just lost the majority of fat surrounding their existing muscles, they would be completely shocked out how amazing they could actually look.
On advice from a physiotherapist friend I put a big sheet of reflective stainless steel across from the anvils in my forge, I don't use a power hammer and now use my left arm and side for most if the initial forging. Helps my back enormously which had some scoliosis. I do feel like a ballerina and hopefully nobody visiting will spot the comparison It is probably the first time my upper body feels symmetric. I also have a home oxygen concentrator used for some brazing but it's a normal medical grade unit set at 4L/m which boosts stamina noticeably.
What is the title? I only see a giant empty space, probably the adblocker doing it... By the way I am happy with my physique for my age, I am easily in the top 1% in my age group. As long as nothing hurts and I can still run around the tennis court like a dog chasing squirrels, I am happy.
" Body by Science: A Research Based Program for Strength Training, Body building, and Complete Fitness in 12 Minutes a Week Paperback – January 1, 2009 by John Little (Author), Doug McGuff (Author)"
I was looking for a picture that would be similar to my body when I found this article that actually belongs here. By the way I look like the dude on his top right version, except I am 10 years older: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/en...-in-just-12-weeks_uk_591c14e0e4b0a7458fa44711
I do double the volume and twice the frequency, with some ~HIIT thrown in, but the general premise is sound. And I don't do SuperSlow reps. However, the rationale for building and maintaining muscle and strength is indisputable, purely from a biological and health standpoint.