"$200MM Per Year Could Reverse Climate Change"

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Scataphagos, Mar 3, 2019.

  1. Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
  2. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Whoa, cons promoting non peer reviewed science to combat global warming? We're making progress.
     
    Tony Stark and futurecurrents like this.
  3. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    What are we trying to reverse?
    Do we want the climate to stop changing?
    Should it remain stagnant?

    Rising temperatures are good.
    More CO2 is good.
    Less pollution is good.
     
    wildchild likes this.
  4. Why oh why can't right wing nut jobs use reliable sources for their "news" ?

    Slashdot? LOL.


    Nothing new, does nothing to reduce CO2 levels.

    This is still happening. And no, it is not good.

    [​IMG]
     
    Tony Stark likes this.
  5. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    LOL IPCC MODELS.
     
    TJustice and elderado like this.
  6. TJustice

    TJustice

    Since there is no peer reviewed science showing that man made co2 causes warming (not based on failed models)... you could be pretty sure the solution could not be peer reviewed either unless it too was based failed models.


     

  7. Yes, jem, we know, take your meds.
     
  8. TJustice

    TJustice

    If only the agw troll future currents had one piece of peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming... he cease posting the same lies and ad homs and win every debate.

    Instead he loses every debate because he has no science so he goes straight to ad homs.

     

  9. Really jem. The meds. You must have forgotten them again.