Why include unnecessary rubbish hypotheses? The concept of the evolution of species is not required by any observation ever made by science.
First you state a "rational basis" should underlie debates, then you declare creationism "a belief system based on fantasy, myth and...
Okay, you beat me.
Are you really that backward? A case is closed AFTER proof is provided, not before. (The rest of your post is just long-winded bigotry.)
That's a purely faith-based statement which you cannot prove. Very funny. Go back and try to read it again.
That would be shocking. I suppose he would have his own cameraman in place, if such were the case.
It's hard to tell whether this guy was continuing to not cooperate as a form of civil disobedience or because he was incapacitated by the first...
The word "assumption" is a faith component, especially since a different subjective inclination could take the exact same formula and proceed in a...
Indeed, ape-based education included.
The somewhat redundant phrase "finite proof" is for the sake of clarity. There are no infinite proofs. Complete rigor is not humanly possible,...
Well, for any finite proof, there are parts included without explicitly conforming to rigor of any sort. They're just assumed, yet the scientific...
Perhaps you can furnish a few examples of specific species related through the process to which you refer, to make more precise commentary...
Science must rest on unscientific premises. To say it's alright or unavoidable for this to happen does not remove the inconsistency.
Separate names with a comma.