James Bond 3rd: Well, you obviously can't comprehend what you read. The article I posted claims that Darwinism is useless to modern medicine....
Posted by Michael Egnor on March 22, 2007 Evolution News & Views Is Darwinism essential to understanding bacterial resistance to antibiotics?...
James Bond 3rd: I understand that the evidence needs be strong for there to be consensus among scientists that something is well established but...
James Bond 3rd: Show me a reference that says inference is based on overwhelming evidence. Show me a reference that says inference is the same...
James Bond the 3rd: When evidence is direct you have proof. Provide some references where it is claimed that an inference must be based on...
James Bond 3rd: Inferences arise in cases where the evidence is circumstantial and thus where we lack direct evidence. Therefore, abiogenesis...
James Bond 3rd: ID can be inferred from empirical data. That's not the same as claiming that ID can be proven. Inference and proof are not the...
James bond 3rd: I didn't say that the appearance of design equals proof of design. The appearance of design warrants a suspicion of design....
TraderNik: Of course the data exists. Richard Dawkins says: These "complicated things that appear to have been designed for a purpose" are...
TraderNik: Data can be interpreted from either a teleological or non-teleological perspective. That I can interprete certain data as...
TraderNik: It wouldn't be good for you as the only evidence you will accept is seeing the designer designing. If there's some other kind of...
TraderNik: Well, you haven't offered a shred of evidence to support your belief in a non-teleological origin of life. As for my not...
TraderNik: Nonsense. ID scientists think like engineers when doing research on the cell. The same approach recommended by Bruce Alberts,...
It's your blind watchmaker perspective that is faith-based and it is useless to science. Scientists learned nothing useful by viewing the cell...
ddunbar: More nonsense. Just 40 years ago scientists viewed the cell as no more complicated than a blob of Jell-O. Scientists are now describing...
ddunbar: Your broad definition of creationist includes just about everyone but atheists. So your statement above translates to this:
ddunbar: Nonsense. Most persons don't consider someone a creationist simply because they are a theist. And you know darn well that the ID...
ddunbar: You find it surprising that atheists aren't attracted to the concept of intelligent design? ddunbar: Richard Dawkins is an atheist...
ddunbar: But it's the Biblical form of creationism (not your definition of creationism) the ID critics are trying to pin on ID and that's what...
ddunbar: Why do you keep repeating this? Have I ever disputed that design implies a designer? We both agree that life is the product of...
Separate names with a comma.