Setting d is not about a price target. It's the minimum expected price differential between prospective entry and exit, which a trader should come...
Is that the royal "we" you are using? You really are the most amusing poster on ET. As far as your convoluted query goes, my question to you...
Are you telling me that you can set d to a value arbitrarily close to zero and still make a profit? The following is included for purposes of...
Good night, your inflatedness.
Perhaps you can explain how it would be possible to determine "a better than 50% chance for profitable movement" without being able to anticipate...
Perhaps you can explain how it would be possible to profit in (directional) trading without being able to anticipate in what direction and to what...
It seems that if the Imaginary Trend were a reality, the following challenge question would have been answered by now: What is a reliable...
I haven't noticed a single responsive answer to my challenge question.
The above is a post made in total ignorance.
What you have proposed is beside the point of the challenge question at hand which requires a prediction of d.
I can only interpret your semi-coherent reply in terms that must come as a disappointment to a large portion of the readership of this thread....
Thanks for the reply. 1. The proposed method needs to produce d, not p1. 2. Everyone knows p0. 3. The variable p1 is the exit price, which is...
That's wonderful. Are you ready to answer the challenge I put forward on page 64?
Interesting results. Are you ready to answer the challenge put forward in my previous post?
The quotes themselves are publicly available. The uses of the quotes in a proprietary system are not.
Welcome to the Age of Automation.
No one goes to that restaurant anymore, it's too crowded. If price trend was anything but a fantasy, it would be such easy money that no one...
There is no free lunch for anybody. That's why 19 out of 20 follows of the Imaginary Trend blow up.
What an ignorant statement.
Separate names with a comma.