I've already stated that there are an endless number of possible evidences you could provide, and I've offered two. Let me repeat it, for the...
Because it's a waste of time.
If it's so "obvious," then why are you unable to produce any scientific evidence in support? The answer, of course, is that the evidence of...
Liberal use of the word "because" in your posts, will gain you credibility. By never supplying any supporting evidence for your statements, you...
The road to ultimate truth is infinitely long. Along the road, however, each milepost is scientifically measurable.
People with reasonably healthy self images have no problem admitting error or changing their opinion based on the existence of new information....
You are mischaracterizing the issue. The question is whether or not ID is scientific. Science requires only a hypothesis and an experiment to...
Yes, I agree. The circular reasoning is very obvious.
Non responsive. Just a monologue devoid of evidence.
You asked for what we would accept as evidence of ID. I just gave you two possible proofs. Now this is the part where you provide the proof....
Only in Karl Popper's obsolete opinion.
OK, Z, show me a complex multipart lifeform which has no fossil ancestry. In other words, a complex lifeform which appears to have been dropped...
You did not read the article. If you did you would know that: 1. The engine of evolution is random mutation (aka DNA replication error). This...
The article does not draw that conclusion. But, if you keep saying that it does long enough, you are certain to convince yourself that it does.
I've already stated that I have no argument with the proposition that evolution is channeled by environmental conditions. So if the environment is...
You're being highly disingenuous. Why don't you quote some of the conclusions of the article? The article does not support the hypothesis of...
OK, here, I'll challenge you to a duel, Z. Each of us gets to ask the other a question in turn. There are only three possible responses to any...
No, it's your reasoning that is silly. Refuting YEC rules out certain tenets of young earth creationism such as the fixity of species and an...
Really? That's fascinating. Z never presents any science and clings to a singular circular logic to support his conclusion. Teleologist has...
Separate names with a comma.