"Laugh while you can, monkey boy." -- John Lithgow, "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai" MGM, Inc. (1984) Probability and statistics underly the...
Why would I provide you with a link to such a quote, when in your next paragraph, you dismiss the idea as meaningless to your position (obviously,...
Mr. Langan is clearly a very brilliant person. I think he may only lack the opportunity to interact with others in his mental league, due to his...
You're correct. Fortuitously, however, since Pascal, Bayes, Heisenberg, Bohr, et. al., have already rendered the statement true for me and for...
Continuously restating this false premise will not render it true, unless you start wearing a brown shirt and carry a club to enforce your...
(eyes roll back) Here we go again. I don't agree that your definition is accurate, obvious or even agreed upon by a majority of ID...
It would be really great if everyone could agree on the definition of the term "intelligent design," before arguing about it. Some possible...
I agree. Langan does have some interesting views. I wonder if any of you actually read his position paper:...
Who is this genius advocate of God to whom you refer?
Concur -- except that in this case, there really is only "one" ID proponent. Schizophrenia uber alles. Zeig Heil.
Your claim is demonstrably false at the subatomic level. You are inventing a definition for uncertainty which is not supported by the science of...
No argument whatsoever. But it still falls to the person want to prove ID is science to confirm it experimentally. Until then, it's just an idea....
The quantum forces which Heisenberg identifies affect everything in the universe -- including the roll of dice, which are subjected to all sorts...
Prove it via a scientific experiment.
I think you're missing the point. Astrology exists but it's not scientific, because when subjected to verification by repeatable experiment, no...
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle demonstrates that your assertion of determinism patently false. But even if you were correct, your...
Assert what ID is, and then prove it by experiment. Until you do, it's not science.
You have yet to show what ID "is." So there's nothing for me to try to show it is not.
No, it's not. I assert something and then I show an experiment confirming it. You assert something and say "prove me wrong," rather than...
Separate names with a comma.