At the moment, scientists can "see" a huge void in the universe: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070823_huge_hole.html No one's sure...
A short life only if you accept the currently accepted cosmological model. My point is that as soon as you insert a creator, you throw science out...
This consciousness proposition is the central dogma of intelligent design, i.e., the premise that the 2nd law of thermodynamics prevents reverse...
My experience is that a fundamentalist Christian will use whatever evidence supports his/her theory of existence, despite any contradictions....
A rim equivalent would be that the universe has always been. It may be expanding now, and it may start to collapse later. But, the point is that...
Why must the universe be the same as a coin and provide only two choices? Why can't the universe land on the rim of the coin?
Okay... The implication of #1 requires the premise of a designer. This is true, because if there are no other universes, then there is no way...
Um, I think your explanation is incorrect, but I'll hold my tongue until I've had an opportunity to check with a couple of well-respected...
I notice that you didn't deny it.
Ah, that's so much better. No sense in hiding behind a new pseudonym after you've been "outed." Welcome back.
Huh? The existence of design is quite testable. The U.S. Patent Office conducts such research every business day. I'm not being flippant, either....
Perhaps we should wait for a Christian to explain.
In as much as your response was entirely non-responsive, I agree that there's no point in our discussing anything on this subject. Please don't...
I've always granted that there's a "chance" of design, thus you cannot require me to prove the negative, because I already concede your point....
I asked for evidence of ID. HH insisted that I define evidence. I defined evidence. You now insist that I define test. Okay. A test is any...
A verifiable test supporting the hypothesis that the original cause of living organisms on Earth is an intelligent designer. So, I'll ask again...
If brilliance is measured by one's ability to avoid substantive conversation while insulting others, then Z was indeed brilliant. And, if I...
:confused: (musing to self...what a curiously Z-like question. Perhaps he's not gone after all.) Since you apparently believe this is an...
Okay, then what evidence do you have that evolution is goal directed?
So, you concede that the ATP synthase could have evolved -- you just don't "think" that it did. Okay, well, the evolutionary "thinking" is...
Separate names with a comma.