LOL! <--- I mean, I actually LOL'ed. Here's why: 1. Catholics see what appears to be an image of Mary on the side of a building and conclude...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz: There is an assumption of non design...
LOL. You, the IDer, examine it in order to attempt a postulation about the designer. Else why bother tentatively determining that it is...
T, You win. Sheesh. I should have known better. I have no one to blame except myself. Edit: parting gift, though wikipedia is by no...
[/b] Not at all. It's the fact that a designer can't be detected is why science doesn't bother postulating a designer. There's no...
I can't hold science to the EXACt same standard because, the basis of the claims is different. And hey, I never said you couldn't speculate on...
All well and good. But once you tentatively determine that something is designed, you invariably will tentatively postulate the designer. There is...
As I don't accept a prostitute's definition of prostition as sex therapy. No one's fooled. It's easy to ascertain the definition of...
OK, I'll grant you that. But you must understand that the qeustion that is BEGGED is, "who is the bioengineer?" Do you not understand that as a...
Stu, I'd agree with you, slap myself (and the other cheek - Jesus said), and eat crow over the idea that I'm being hypocritical in respects to...
LOL. 2cents pointed you in right direction. I'm not going to do your homework for you. But there are many many creationists who accept human...
BTW Z, I wish you would stop arguing as if I don't support ID. It's almost as if you aren't reading what I post but detect a few dissenting...
I don't know Z. I Don't know. An order is an order. Agreed. But attaching intelligence to it makes it sentient. Artificial intelligence was...
You're not talking about THAT guy again... My point. Well, it's simple really. ID was started by creationists (the many forms of creationism)...
Right. Prove one and you prove the other. Hence, "prove both." But the problem is, ultimately to prove design in the manner in which we are...
Funny. I embrace evolution. Also support ID when it's not being masked as anything other than creationism and am a creationist. Oh, and I'm a...
Multiverse? Sure. But don't introduce an intelligence. An intelligence, and an active ine at that denotes sentience. In this case a god. An...
Zx10, Yes, intelligent design can be a generic term. Much as the example you gave of a computer program being evidence of intelligent design....
Yes, that true. Because the inference of design necessiates the inference of a designer. Any evidence that pint to design, points to a designer....
Knock, knock. Theist here - not ID critic. Well my good friend, if the inference of design is there, the inference of a designer goes along...
Separate names with a comma.