Withheld Iraq report blamed on French By Michael Smith LONDON DAILY TELEGRAPH LONDON â The French secret service is believed to have...
Bush To Personally Verify Future CIA Reports (2003-07-11) -- In an effort to make sure all of his public statements are accurate, U.S. President...
If you go back a few pages, you will find a Daily Telegraph article that quotes British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw defending the claim that SH...
A more accurate and less biased formulation would be: Bush has admitted to having included one inadequately supported item in his SOTU in the...
Barbarism is a value judgment. Indeed, the very origins of the word "barbarism" are in the Greeks' way of distinguishing themselves from other...
July 11, 2003, 11:00 a.m. Scandal! Bushâs enemies aren't telling the truth about what he said. By Clifford May The president's critics...
Rewriting History To Attack Bush On Iraq By John Hawkins If you picked up a paper in the last week or so, you probably got the impression that...
We were right about uranium, Straw tells CIA By Colin Brown, Political Editor (Filed: 13/07/2003) Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, last...
As previously, pure supposition with no basis in concrete analysis or events. [b] I am saying that the term itself is a slur - typically...
Resolution 1441 was a unified ultimatum: "full and immediate compliance" or face "serious consequences." Everyone know what it meant. Given the...
I don't see how holding back current information on WMDs could be considered harmful to national security, though I would consider holding onto...
[b] You keep on saying this, but, when challenged to provide supporting evidence, you punt. [b] Okay - then I really wonder whether you...
And yet, when the ultimatum was clear, and then re-stated in even sharper terms, and was defied, you would prefer that we held back yet once...
There has been much speculation among relatively well-informed sources that the Administration is holding onto WMD information that it has not yet...
Men rely on platitudes when they are incapable of answering specific arguments directly. So you were in favor of intense military pressure...
I suspect Kant would not presume that Bush was lying without good reason to do so, as he would be aware that making baseless charges of dishonesty...
Non-responsive: You asked, "Who armed Osama?" You did not ask, "Who armed the mujahideen?" Undoubtedly, some of the arms supplied to Afghan...
Separate names with a comma.