Search Results

Search Again

  1. Interactive Brokers question

    Pardon my ignorance, but how much is that SEC fee?
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Retail Brokers

  2. Interactive Brokers question

    Thanks, sorry for that grammatical error :D So for 1000 shares, I am expecting to pay $7.5. Which comes out to $7.5/1000= $0.0075 per share?
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Retail Brokers

  3. Interactive Brokers question

    I am thinking about opening a new account. From what I understand the fees structure is $0.005 (1000 shares.) edited My question: what...
    Thread by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003, 14 replies, in forum: Retail Brokers

  4. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    hahahha. I'll pass on that offer :D
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  5. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    I am talking about the funds. I checked morningstar and msn money. Their numbers are the same, but Wall sTreet City numbers are Way too...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  6. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    Well... I have a feeling that hte website is wrong or something... Just use Excel and follow the above formula. Keep me posted.
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  7. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    I am using MSN money's database, which is pretty reliable. And none has an alpha over 17%. I am talking about YOUR fund performance...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  8. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    36.14% is pretty damn good.
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  9. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    check out this link: http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/partsub/funds/portfolio.asp?Symbol=ATCHX&Funds=1 ATCHX's alpha is 15.38.... which is...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  10. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    Well ... the reason I asked is because the number does NOT add up. How is possible to have 54% nominal (i.e. non-risk adjusted return) and...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  11. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    where did you get this information?
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  12. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    I am sorry to hear about your situation. Usually internship application is DUE in January. Its now June. ... and the number of available...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 15, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  13. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    What's OP? Like I said before: low-alpha would not get you an offer.
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 14, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  14. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    With China becoming increasingly more prominent, Why not work in China? With your credential (especially with an American degrre), you would be...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 14, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  15. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    Well, a trader takes position (long/short securities) usually for less than a month, aka. short term profits. Asset management on the other...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 14, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  16. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    Looking at your yahoo chart... are you simply using MACD??
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 14, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  17. 54% return -- looking for an internship

    No offense, but simply looking at your performance vs the broad indices... your performance (54% or whatever the number is) won't draw much...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 14, 2003 in forum: Prop Firms

  18. How George Soros knows what he knows

    It's funny how NO ONE remember that George Soros recently (a couple of years back) lost $2 BILLION ( that's right Billion ). Follow up with a...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 12, 2003 in forum: Psychology

  19. Unbelievable but true: CFTC declares Technical Analysys as FRAUD :D!!!

    Pretty good trend so far. I just wanted to add: More people using TA <b>weakens</b> its efficacy NOT enhanced. You want people NOT to use...
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 9, 2003 in forum: Trading

  20. Unbelievable but true: CFTC declares Technical Analysys as FRAUD :D!!!

    The test for market efficiency is based on the joint hypothesis test NOT profit and loss.
    Post by: FishSauce, Jun 9, 2003 in forum: Trading
Showing results 41 to 60 of 142 Next >
Search Again