No, not so good :)
Ok. It'll cost us some sleep, but we can live with that.
Can you show us some stats (not charts) that can back up that claim, which outlines the high probability/positive expectancy of transient zones,...
No difference really https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/speculator.asp
This kind of order: [ATTACH]
Sounds like a custom build. Since execution isn’t needed, I’d just hire a competent developer on Upwork to do it using Python with crystal clear...
Don't forget this scenario as well: [ATTACH]
The luck factor is evident in the math, without even looking at the strategy. To aim for 2% a day means X amount of losing trades wipes you out,...
Of course, it's good for shit, but their free version beats anything web-based that's free.
I don’t know bud they’re moving up quick. Tradingview went to 1M to 3M+ subscribers quickly. I underestimated them and passed up on a VC...
Same time my gonads hit the bottom
True, but the OP made it clear he fully intends to read the market. Also unlike naked positions, what you are suggesting isn’t viable without...
Judging by your research tool of choice, i’ll take that with a grain of sea salt.
Sure. Stay away from options. The odds get even more stacked against you with the added variables.
I was thinking the same. Not even a brief description of a competitive advantage.
I beg to differ
I’m glad for him, but any strategy that depends on luck won’t cut it. I shoot the shit on ET for interaction, but at the same time want fellow...
2% a day? It’s detached from reality. Why hide the truth and encourage him to crash and burn?
I think you shall not
No doubt about it. It’s not about direction. It’s putting yourself in the right place/time with strict size/risk control that makes or breaks you.
Separate names with a comma.