Selling covered calls isn't investment "protection" Married puts could be considered "protection", but not CCs - it's a common mistake...
Exactly correct - but it's a point so many covered call writers don't seem to understand. Loads of CC guys lost their shorts during the...
Fed by trillions of dollars improperly accounted for and/or overstated in order to give the appearance of profits where in many cases none existed...
Didn't happen to be Citibank was it?? I've had similar problems with the part of Citibank's call center that's been outsourced to India. Three...
That's what the buggy whip makers and the manual cotton pickers all said. Not many of them around anymore though (although some of the buggy...
You think that's bad - try opening a keyboard at a police, fire, or transit dispatching center - 5 points of crumbs, bits of chicken, dirt, dust,...
Just curious, but why do you think it's "much less so"?? Isn't it still going out at something like 90 times earnings? Basically one source...
What a bunch of crap - it's nothing but a damn L2 display with integrated ECN order books. It's turned into a game of who can file a patent...
The Patent Office is getting more and more out of control - they're authorizing patents without knowing enough about the areas the patents cover....
Try this link http://ichart.yahoo.com/table.csv?s=^SPX&a=00&b=3&c=1950&d=07&e=7&f=2004&g=d&ignore=.csv Should download a Comma Separated Values...
Not around here
And if you added 10 units after each loss it would be that much better :) Think about it, you already know that your small population sample is...
Apparently in your case, seeing is believing - but seeing isn't necessarily understanding. The official synopsis of the documentary says it was...
Harry - do you even bother to thoroughly read the stuff you post?? They're saying that the documentary was a tongue in cheek attempt to show...
Check some of the more recent posts - seems harry was easily sucked into believing this BS because he's so willing to believe almost any...
Oh, I see - you ass-u-me that newspapers seeking headlines as inciting (not insightful) as possible to sell papers are (1) always the final...
You don't seem to understand how the Supreme Court works or what its responsibilities are. You just want what you want regardless of whether it's...
A supposition on your part is far from a fact. Do they want to deal with the issue? Some justices seem to have wanted to voice an opinion...
You can argue that they ducked the issue all you want. However, the fact is that the real message the Supreme Court sent was to the lower...
Now, now - don't argue with harry - afterall, he reads New Scientist (and apparently believe anything he reads) :)
Separate names with a comma.