:confused:
Do you know any of them? I do. Some are my neighbors...
I wouldn't expect it to. You want someone with "ball's and persistence". The $4B that was given to them to manage was done on the premise that...
Try telling that to the Renaissance Technologies guys. They have about 80 PhDs over there and spend quite a bit of time quantifying imbalances....
PRECISELY!!! It is absolutely imperative to nail down the simpler stuff... Being effective with simple tools enables one to sort out the points...
YES!!!! EXACTLY! The issue is that many times, one's sweeping frequency is lagging. As a result you may miss the signal. The workaround to this is...
We have a long weekend. I will attempt a full fledge flesh out of what I SEE! It is IMPERATIVE to know how a tool works before using it to do...
Just out of curiosity, on average, how long would you say that you typically hold a trade???
Agreed. I am the same way. This is how I arrived at the +/- 2 values (ie. after figuring out what must be what and then visually calibrating)...
Initially, just watch for the strong stuff... This is like +/- 5 territory... You can actually profile str/squ for strength just like volume......
The problem with esignal is that it does not commit the extremes to memory. I haven't done the catching up on the thread yet but in gleening...
Wait till we get well ramped! Hopefully we can get some night owls to shift between US Futures during the day, and Forex Futures in the wee...
No bragging here... Just stating the facts! I guess any one who makes REAL BUCKS is bragging in trading as far as you see... So they should rename...
So have the moderators pull down the list of participants who voted and post them... The poll sorts out whether you have voted or not and which...
Funny how in candyland, REAL forward tested money (supported by backtests) added more REAL BUCKS to buy a few REAL things, whereas your backtested...
A work of art indeed.
Alot of things have gone over your head, so goes trading. Mon ami, that is a forecast. They run their weather models based on current conditions...
Mon ami, you emphasized the wrong part. The anticipation is a CONSEQUENCE! If you take your umbrella with you out the door, you are anticipating...
Scroll down mon ami... DOWN as in your backtest EQ curve!
LOL... The forward test went both ways mon ami (ie. no bias). That means you go long on the 0->7 and short on the 3->4... Having conditions like...
Separate names with a comma.