In isolation, you could arguably give Lucrum a pass. But against the background of his posting history, the underlying string is unmistakable....
See Lucrum. See Lucrum jump.
Hey, when it comes to dog-whistle racism any ostensible reason will do.
Yeah, but you know it's true. Even so, I think it's very sporting of you hide behind laughably paper-thin plausible deniability.
Yes, the intelligentsia were squarely behind the McCain/Palin ticket.
Still can't quite get over having a black president, can you?
Why do I get the vague feeling that your comment has racial overtones? Perhaps it has something to do with your post history. No doubt, you said...
How challenging it must be for you to mind your own business.
There is no "truth" to adequately support a belief in the existence of a god aside from feelings and such. Therefore, as a seeker of truth, you...
Why ask why?
Bingo.
What a marvelously novel approach, to consider new evidence as it actually presents itself with man's slowly increasing grasp of the universe....
Oh, so logical, scientific thinking when it's convenient and whimsy when it's not? Sure. A theist can do as he pleases. And if he presents his...
Exactly. No need for a Creator. Unless you have evidence to the contrary, when you hear hoofbeats, think horses not zebras. Ever hear of Occam?
You're right. Let's all prostrate ourselves before a "god" who, by all accounts clearly does not give a shit one way or the other. (Almost as if...
Theists. In all their splendor.
...prostrating himself before a "god" who, by all accounts, clearly does not give a shit one way or the other. (Almost as if he wasn't there. Hmm.)
...and that those holes would be mere smudges on the landscape as compared to the canyons found in the theories embraced by theists.
Absolutely. And if all Americans wanted to attend the State Dinner, then the White House should have been prepared to accommodate over 300...
Separate names with a comma.