of course Brooks does not say whether to sell or buy. you have to make that decision
i agree but traders do not want to wait they want instant gratification. they say Brooks is wrong but is it not possible they lose money...
no it is not..... traders demand explanation. they can try and find out by themselves but they do not. They go to Brooks, Hansen, forums like...
which is the same thing. All Brooks is doing, is teaching a generic trend trading thing. I have made this point many times. so how can you say...
why not do both? Brooks says context is important. a chart is only giving you information. you are searching for clues for information for feed...
i have finally started thinking in terms of H1 H2 H3 AND L1 L2 L3. HOW does that help? you have to know whether the present move is PB or the...
Brooks' genius is in understanding and teaching that patterns in market are rarely text book. and that something that walks like a duck, quacks...
Brooks books are all written a while in the past. Brooks recently admitted he is getting better at explaining his method and i can vouch for...
why books ? when videos are available! you can see and learn anything easier than reading a book and trying
i am not a profitable trader. why would i buy a course if i am profitable? but if i am not profitable i am NOT blaming Brooks like all these...
books are horrible vehicles for learning anything. if i want my cook to make a dish i show a video on you tube. do not read his books. the...
every body who has written book on any subject on any technique does not provide proof
what Brooks says is ridiculously simple. you need only have a basic knowledge about basic market structure.
practice makes perfect
all are cycles
i did not say bull i said bulls numerous bulls excrement, to be precise. or to be more precise Elliot's shit
do not bulls shit me . every elliot analyst labels different there is always an alternate wave count.
Brooks and EW and gann and anybody else ALL talk about the market cycle. the market is the same does not matter who looks at it. or analyses it...
i used it for 10 years. i read it in 1987 .that was my first book every bloody has an alternate wave count. everything is GOOD as the one using it.
his method is perfect. but it is you who has to learn to execute it. that takes time and most want someone to blame for their short comings.
Separate names with a comma.