Hahahahaha!
Very interesting. Thank you. What I would want to know if I were either the defense attorney or the prosecutor in that case is the details of...
Not only do I like this. I like it a lot!
You have good points. We have to learn to make distinctions. All these incidents are not the same. And that requires that we await the real...
This is a very good observation. And it is not just politicians. We are all, myself certainly, far too quick to make assumptions before we have...
o_O
Essentially what you say is true in the main. And nearly all of us are rich compared to the general population in some nations. But are those the...
I'm not sure what you mean by this, can you elaborate a bit. I assume the attacks on police in the 1970s you mentioned must be referring to...
To try and understand what is happening here I think you must make an effort to put yourself in the other man's shoes. Unless you can do that, at...
“Some officers were shot in the back,” said Brown, who added that this men were attacked “ambush-style” by snipers from an elevated position. Or...
Now that's an interesting point of view!
The only germane cases are ones with close parallels to the Clinton case involving mishandling of classified information without being able to...
You have no way to know that. You are bullshitting.
"Precedent" in the legal sense. Yes. It may be irrelevant, but see the last paragraph. As you would agree, I'm sure, it is prior, similar...
Has anyone claimed such? Did you advance beyond the 9th grade?
He would have objected just on principle, if nothing else. The two of them loved to argue about anything and everything.
It is extremely well done political commentary on history, wouldn't you agree?
There is no lack of precedence in this case, and it's federal statutes, not State, that pertain.
"There you go again," willfully using facts to wreck delusions.
Separate names with a comma.