This is saying a lot coming from a guy that has not made once single bullish post during this ENTIRE 8 WEEK RALLY. Tell me, what is it like to...
Well, well . . . Look who just showed up??? The moron that missed-out on the entire rally off of the October 13th low. Not one single...
The recent pullback is over. A close above 1265.05 today will confirm this. Look for a rally of almost 36 handles from yesterday's low of...
Correction could very well have ended today at $14.29 Crude coming back off again will send this stock back to the old highs. Go with a strong...
Joe, thanks so much for posting the photos from the Chicago ET Traders Expo. As you can tell, a great time was had by all! I'm sure that Las...
The "commercials" are people that actually have something to do with the actual physical commodity that is being traded, such as the refiners or...
Yes, it is the chipset. It runs a specific algorithym that sorts data out.
If it is anything like the Chicago Expo, I'm sure that it will be a SUCCESS.
ET is awesome. Without these insightful and informative threads . . . who knows what ET would actually become! :eek:
You are being far too kind. You caught the village idiot in yet another lie. The fact of the matter is that mentioning the name of a fund on...
Very well said, and indeed true. Once again, rubberbird is caught spewing a bunch of lies in an effort to validate his typical excuses. He has...
Trust me Perseus, this kid is full of hot air and nothing else. He is afraid to reveal anything truthful about himself because the pathetic...
That's right. It's no big deal for you to reveal your NYFE acronym from a futures exchange that is essentially for all intent and purposes,...
Yes, I agree that this is one of the more revealing points that has ever been made about this guy. He allegedly manages 9 figures and yet has...
Yawn. Just as I suspected. Revealing your trading badge ID from a now defunct futures exchange is just too personal for you . . . You...
You are correct indeed Sir. I should have used the word precondition instead of the phrase . . . under one condition in order to be more specific...
No . . . I think that everyone here on ET can agree that the bet was about posting $10,000 to find out whether or not you are "immortalized in 2...
So make your disclosure now in order to fulfill the one condition that I stated that I needed to have happen, and I will follow-thru with the bet....
What is it about the sentence above . . . "under one condition" that you do not understand Little Man? Here is a definition from Lectric Law...
I think you are pretty close! :D
Separate names with a comma.