The initial target is 1142. Below that is anyones guess. You should start a new thread: "Which comes first, 1142 or 1250 SPX ?" That may...
Out SPX 1,184.37. +8 - 2 = ~ +6. NFV(2)
Another short setup forming here at about 1181 SPX. Odds good it is worth about 3 to 5 handles.
It is so funny. I guess I will remain misunderstood. Those women do ZERO for me.
NFV 1080.57. NFV(1) 1116.39. NFV(2). 1151.18. SPX 1,179.04. ^^^^^ Instead of me babbling, I thought you might prefer some hard cold hard facts...
Oh boy.....But nowhere near the time for the "Das Boot" video, yet.
If this gives up the ghost, what does it look like? Sorry, I don't remember what a -3% day looks like. The last hour of the day could see a...
Odds of red SPX? Imo ~85%
On short time frames, algorithmic traders are probably conciously or not, implementing a form of Backward induction...
The kind of equilibrium we seek cannot be Nash-Equilibrium, since players are constantly changing their strategies: Nash equilibrium...
"The New Socialism: Global Collectivist Society Is Coming Online "Bill Gates once derided open source advocates with the worst epithet a...
Is it? Say an ELE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_event was headed our way. Would markets sell off? What good would it do? You see,...
One thing that has always been interesting to me is, ok, markets are a discounting mechanism, so they discount and price the future. Why not price...
Ja. What is really strange is that NFV(2) went ___lower___ on the construction news, and the market went higher. I don't know... Hard to...
NFV 1082.32. NFV(1) 1122.86. NFV(2) 1157.55. SPX 1192.47. Out ESZ0 1189 -3. Transfer to S SPX 1192.47 NFV(2).
With this machine, I don't know why anyone would buy an iPad http://www.apple.com/macbookair/features.html 1/2" thick at thickest point....
Are you purposely trying to tease me? :D
S ESZ0 1186.00 NFV(2) (extrapolated)
Rigth. I abhor fractions of penny quotes. BTW, the reason is not to front run you, they want the fill/or not to get information. That is the...
Of course not. That should be downright illegal, and if you can prove it, send the evidence to the SEC. So you object to limit orders being...
Separate names with a comma.