Stu wrote: Behe doesn't reject any observable feature of evolution. Behe accepts that species evolve, therefore, Behe is an evolutionist not...
Quote from Teleologist: But Behe doesn't argue that species don't evolve which is what you say defines a creationist. Behe applies IC not to...
Stu wrote: But Behe doesn't deny that species evolve. ID doesn't deny that species evolve. Therefore, ID isn't creationism and Behe isn't a...
Stu wrote: Your definition of creationist is correct but it doesn't apply to Behe or Intelligent Design which is clearly explained in the...
I would like to focus on the origin of life on earth rather than the origin of the universe. We can't prove that an intelligence exists that...
What would happen if the creationists began to embrace the criticâs watered-down definition of creationism? One may attempt to define...
Acronym wrote: Define creationism.
When you ask ID critics what would cause them to merely suspect design they are stumped. They can only come up with things that amount to a proof...
kjkent1 wrote: Why do you continue to portray this debate as design versus evolution? Evolution and design can co-exist. Things can be...
kjkent1 wrote: Evolutionary biologist Denis Lamoureux says: Knowing that organisms evolve is not a positive reason for excluding design from...
kjkent1 wrote: There is no razzle-dazzle magic bullet test that proves ID. If there was then ID would be a fact and not a hypothesis. Why...
drtomaso wrote: So its wrong to consider something that looks and functions like a machine to be a literal machine if we don't know who...
Hansel H wrote: Neither am I. ID is not anti-evolution. Things can be designed to evolve. Evolution can be designed. Evolution can be used by...
kjkent1 wrote: What do you mean by "test", precisely? You can't really test a historical proposition in the same way that you test things in the...
KJkent1 wrote: I think it could have originated via a goal-directed form of evolution. I reject the notion that it's the product of an...
FerdinandAlx wrote: You previously said: "the problem with intelligent design is that in its explanation it focuses not on the design but on...
FerdinandAlx wrote: Not true. ID is focused precisely on the design and not the designer. It is the ID critics that insist on bringing the...
Stu replies: Cells reproduce. Molecular machines do not reproduce. They are assembled within the cell part by part. Do some research. Stu...
Stu wrote: You are the one that is ill informed. Considering the the F-ATP synthase, Science News reported "With parts that resemble pistons...
Stu wrote: This coming from a guy that thinks machines orginate via sheer dumb luck!
Separate names with a comma.