Someone must have slipped it some elephant juice
What is your view of how this would profit?
Yeah but Murphy makes sure that all your's do. [/tongue in cheek] :D
Murphy's Law states that your stocks suddenly acquire more beta on the downside though. Not relevant, but just one of those things. :p
1/ Yes 2/ No
:( I obviously have to lift my game. :D
You limit risk to $5 But you exchange one sort of risk for another, measured by the Greeks.
Why? It's just the synthetic of what you already have. :confused: PS - If you don't want the shares, roll the options out/up/down/whatever...
If there were a smooth-continuous trajectory upwards, with the underlying always conveniently atm or just otm at expiry, it may be possible....
What? But.... but... I can make 4-5% per month according to the gurus! They wouldn't lie... would they? :p :p
zzz...zzz...zzz...zzz pffft
1/ Please do not insult our intelligence. 2/ No.
This is a fallacy. 85% of options do not expire worthless. Have a look here for the true figures...
I'm probably not the only one that is finding your vendetta against this poster extremely tiresome. Move on FFS.
Only if you're a pleb. The rules are different for GS et al :mad:
The Big O might have it, they used to do it for nix. But may be subscription only now. $GVZ will still be a reasonable proxy otherwise the arb...
This was a big argument on here some time ago with some of the clowns at "The Big O". You lose the up front cost of carry on the vertical....
I have the definitive answer to this question... ... but you'll have to wait till expiry day - I'll let you know then. :cool:
Because instant experts get flamed here. :D
Why not just pay $5 -$7k for a weekend seminar and become an instant expert? :p
Separate names with a comma.