I don't understand the "huge financial capabilities argument" Here's why: Even if someone only had 0.01 percent of the capital the fund...
Maybe your observation but again based on your statement (believe you even said "not knowing themselves") this would likely be emotional...
I mean it's a well known fact day trading as your only source of income is one of the more difficult things to accomplish consistently year over...
Okay, I will refrain from using them in the future.
It is logical, but you have to know how to find the logic - that's the hard part. Also, even if you tell people the logic and how to make...
This doesn't really make sense. So, if you're "averaging up" that would mean you have some mathematical edge or advantage that allows you to know...
EDIT: Not in the mood for a debate.
If you mean in a negative way than no, I don't think it actually does - although when I first thought about it seemed like that might be logical....
While a little out there and kind of conspiracy like, I could see and wouldn't be surprised if there is manipulation against retail to some...
Come on guys, NQ is over its highs, you know people are shorting ES...... Micro E-minis coming soon..... you'd be surprised how many retail...
Well see overbought isn't as reliable as oversold. That's why people think it's not effective way to view the market. You cannot reliably...
I wasn't being an apologist as I stated or at least that wasn't my intention, I edited my post as to avoid a discussion as I know how these go, so...
edit: nm
greed never seems to pay for me.
wouldn't mind seeing 40.50 today followed by a bounce. but well see how it goes.
yeah you got it, that's the one. I just use a more simple name for it, like they say keep it simple.
Double downward dog, angry bird pattern.... I agree obvious short
edit: nevermind
Separate names with a comma.